Why would Bush capture bin Laden when bin Laden is still working for him and the CIA?
2007-07-18 11:04:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Bush and Cheney already gave the Carlyle Group a free pass. Bin Laden wont ever be arrested by the Bush family, they are making way too much money off of the drama. It would be hilarious if when Hillary becomes President, she gets him within a month or so of her inauguration.
2007-07-18 12:56:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by leonard bruce 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
I actual don't be attentive to why he took his eye off of Bin weighted down and particularly invaded Iraq. That has have been given to be the unanswered question of the decade. i think, it has a hell of so lots greater to do with oil and gun working, thinking we sell, no less than, 35% of the worlds hands in accordance to a 2005 congressional learn, and a few autonomous examine placed that at as much as 60%. Plus, if we are so worried approximately Bin weighted down, why did we invade an oil wealthy united states of america? Why do no longer we invade countries that do terrible issues to its human beings, that don't have organic materials we prefer? Why no longer N Korea, or hell, the Southern Philippines that provides the Muslim there surprisingly much no say interior the country or perhaps persecutes them. If one seems at this pragmatically, then all of it provides up surprisingly merely. on the different hand, partisans the two prefer to have self assurance all that's incorrect, or all that's good, yet won't have the capacity to look to stability and are available to a basic experience answer. the different element that extremely bothers me, is maximum persons interior the united states of a have no theory what Bin weighted down is pizzzzed off approximately. we've been informed many times returned, its because of the fact they like to destroy our way of existence. Does it ever happen to maximum, that has no longer something to do with it, that its any other way around? That we are slowly destroying their lives by using propping up repressive governments so they might pump their united states of america dry in a hundred years. human beings like Bin weighted down and maximum all people who's severe of what the united states of a is doing interior the middle east, is disregarded, even nevertheless they have been asserting for some years that we could hear. we don't, so as that breeds greater hatred, greater Bin Ladens, greater death and destruction. In essence, we are attempting to act like a foul determine to the remainder of the worldwide, notably people who're the least properly off, and those human beings in retaliation are having temper tantrums. i actual do no longer blame them. Peace Jim .
2016-10-19 05:56:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by chicklis 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Will you support the invasion of Pakistan in order to capture Bin Laden genius?
2007-07-18 10:57:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Great question...you really got under the skin of Bush apologists. They get upset and whine like kids when you make fun of them. Give them a happy meal and a nap.
2007-07-18 11:04:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by AB17 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
Actually once Hillary becomes president, all Bin Laden will have to do is donate a couple of million to the DNC and the Hillary for presidential library fund and he will receive amnesty and a presidential pardon.
Ask Mark Rich how easy that deal is.
2007-07-18 10:56:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeremy A 3
·
1⤊
6⤋
More likely he'd give him a tip off if anyone was getting near to catching him.
2007-07-18 11:10:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by hog b 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nahhh !!! GWB knows there are millions of us old vets that would LOVE to get bin Laden into their sights. With me, not a quick death for bin-ny boy!! Too bad, tho, won't happen.
Besides, WHAT KIND OF NUT WOULD ASK SUCH A STUPID QUESTION???
Uncle Wil
2007-07-18 11:03:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
you would have to be actively pursuing bin Lden to capture him, remember once the boogyman is gone the fear is gone and the masses will see the truth.
2007-07-18 11:00:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by douglas m 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
Your premise is flawed, Bush has stopped looking for him.
Unlike Sadam he didn't have oil. If we don't look, we can't find, don't find never gets a chance to pardon.
2007-07-18 10:57:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋