English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ron Paul isn't an isolationist like people repeatedly and mindlessly say, over and over again.
Isolationism is when the borders are completely closed, Ron Paul supports free trade with all countries while protecting our borders from illegal immigrants.
What drives people to not understand the difference?
Do the interventionists think it is OK for the US taxpayer to fund foreign boondoggles and tyrants? Why not just let other countries live in peace?

2007-07-18 10:20:22 · 7 answers · asked by freedom_vs_slavery 3 in Politics & Government Elections

7 answers

Because he doesn't support corporate welfare like all the other candidates such as Hillary, Obama, Rudy, and Romney.

2007-07-19 17:24:09 · answer #1 · answered by John 5 · 1 0

is this your first marketing campaign? Welcome to politics...human beings lie approximately something they'd. And, of course, this is lots much less complicated to lie approximately somebody who would not have the click at the back of him, via fact he's have been given so few shops to get the be conscious out. They call him isolationist via fact this is an unpopular be conscious. this is the only reason. That, and the certainty that there is a few smidgeon of fact, in that he needs to intrude in different international locations under any of the different applicants. curiously, everybody else thinks this is our pastime to meddle in another u . s . a .'s affairs. i think of the folk of this u . s . a . are so lots greater supportive of non-intervention than the politicians are.

2016-10-21 23:08:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you can call someone else an 'interventionist' and mean it, you're likely an isolationist.

Though, really, most Americans /are/ isolationists at heart, so don't be so sure being called that is all bad...

2007-07-18 10:24:47 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1 0

Yet another status-quo robot. ^^^^^

Nixon's foreign policy? You loved that Pusherhombre? I liked Colin Powell's non-interventionalist, non-unilateralist policy much better, but Bush took that, and crapped all over it within the course of a year. No nationbuilding. Haha. Nothing he says ever turns out the way he says.

2007-07-18 10:33:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Yet another Ron Paul robot.

2007-07-18 10:27:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Because they rule over all other peoples opinions

2007-07-18 10:25:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm not that familiar with him but I think he had his own show on E. I've seen him when he's not all made up, and believe me he looks much better as a drag queen.

2007-07-18 10:47:13 · answer #7 · answered by ericbryce2 7 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers