Playhouse Congress is throwing sleepovers while our troops are fighting this war for freedom. Also, let's talk about real failures. How many times has this senseless bill failed? The surge helped the Iraqis meet 8 crucial benchmarks, one time. Is Congress going to stick to having pillow fights, instead of actually doing something to better America?
2007-07-18 09:56:22 · 9 answers · asked by girlonfire *White Sox Pride* 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I have told Democrat voters time, and time again this is not for our soldiers the Democrats are fighting over. It's the money that could be going into the Democrats pocket, this is what it's really about. Did you know that when Bill Clinton was in the (White House) he was the first President in (HISTORY) to cut the military back so far we had (NO) protection what so ever. But the Democrat voters still keep voting the party line for this scum. Democrat voters don't help the USA at all!
2007-07-18 10:15:13 · answer #1 · answered by ? 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the iraqi parliament is taking the entire month of august off as a vacation, thereby ensuring that they won't meet any of their benchmarks.
why is congress a three ring circus - you can pretend that the american people don't know - but we know that the repubs (who oddly used to rail against filibusters) are now literally filibustering every bill that is advanced.
what game are the cons playing now - just obstructing the will of the entire nation.
or perhaps they feel that the will of the people as expressed in the last election is 'grandstanding' and 'political theatre.'
well, here's hoping that all the cons who now obstruct in defense of a needless war in iraq, while al quaeda are on the afganistan - pakistani border will have plenty of time to take in more theatre after the next elections.
2007-07-18 17:41:36 · answer #2 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Our troops are not fighting a war for freedom. In fact, even Bush can't figure out what the war is for! First he was fighting the war because Saddam had WMDs. Except there were no WMDs. OOOOOOOPS! Then we were supposed to be fighting the terrorists over there so we wouldn't fight them here. Right. Turning Iraq into a cesspool of violence really curbed terrorism, didn't it. Then we were supposed to bring democracy to Iraq. Instead, there's a civil war.
Bravo to Reid for pushing for an end to this occupation that will do no good except to get more Americans killed.
2007-07-18 17:13:28 · answer #3 · answered by feline11105 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
How can I say this? He Does not listen, has a god-complex and is an over all goat! He only listens to himself, therefore think of the situation that people are in that live in Nevada, with the Kangaroo court system!!
2007-07-18 18:24:56 · answer #4 · answered by ShadowCat 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Reid/Pelosi aren't at all concerned with anything but their hate campaign.
2007-07-18 17:06:48 · answer #5 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
ABSOLUTELY...considering he unilateraly declared failure and surrender, do you think you are going to get anything out of him useful AT ALL??? surely your not that naive.
2007-07-18 18:13:34 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You can tell him, but he's not going to listen. He hasn't heard it so far.
2007-07-18 17:03:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think they stuffed and mounted him last night.....
2007-07-18 17:07:33 · answer #8 · answered by Ken C 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you bet ye.
2007-07-18 17:08:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋