2007-07-18 09:38:38 · 4 answers · asked by jedi1josh 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a huge issue. Why should any web site take a back seat regarding speed of delivery?
Just another instance of big business trying to squeeze out the little guy...
2007-07-18 11:15:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Gave you a star - don't know the answer - good question
Libertarians are total free marketeers and net neutrality would impose govt regulations on privately owned property.
This might be a conundrum for Libertarians
2007-07-18 09:50:39 · answer #2 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some people think net neutrality is purely about access but its about much more than that. I am not a libertarian but my view is similar on many issues.
I dont think someone should be restricted access but I think that a service provider should be able to give higher paying , or ones that pay at all, customers priority.
ya know similar to download sites that give you more bandwidth and more mirror selections if you are a paying subscriber.
2007-07-18 10:05:23 · answer #3 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I'm all for it. People shouldn't be restricted access to information, regardless of the source.
2007-07-18 09:49:57 · answer #4 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋