http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070718/ap_on_re_us/katrina_contractors
So we can add FEMA to the endless list of government inefficiencies, including Am-Track, USPS, education, farm subsidies, etc.
I can't wait for the government to take over medicine and health care, can you?
2007-07-18 08:14:01 · 6 answers · asked by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
This shows that we don't need the government envolved in heathcare. Anything the government gets it's hands on, or is involved in, gets turned into a mess in one way or another. Instead of adding more government regulation, maybe we should lessen them.
2007-07-18 08:48:18 · answer #1 · answered by j 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You have a great sense of humor.Please don't start any rumors. We are in sad shape now and letting the government into health care would be the ultimate disaster. Peace
2007-07-18 08:20:48 · answer #2 · answered by PARVFAN 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Somebody needs to do something about health care. Before too long, only the very rich will be able to afford decent care or an emergency by-pass or a kidney transplant.
And to the devil with all the rest who can't pay their price!
2007-07-18 08:19:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'd be happy with the government taking over the payments for healthcare (which is being discussed, contrary to your incorrect premise)
2007-07-18 08:17:45 · answer #4 · answered by outcrop 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
NO, if I heard it on fox news I've said it a thousand times, Health care should only be for people who can afford it.
2007-07-18 08:17:00 · answer #5 · answered by Chuckles 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I am hoping that they do as good a job on health care as they do securing our borders!!!!
Wait.....
uh, nevermind
2007-07-18 08:21:49 · answer #6 · answered by Mark A 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋