English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If, as science suggests, the universe originated from a “big bang” how did any material elemental or otherwise escape the Swartzchild radius or event horizon of the original singularity?

2007-07-18 08:11:14 · 12 answers · asked by ydrisil 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

12 answers

From what I understand about it, the Swartzchild radius could be escaped due to the intense acceleration of matter. That would mean that matter would have to have been traveling faster than light. Not something that you would see in today's universe but the big bang theory claims that there were many unusual things going on for the first few seconds.

2007-07-18 11:31:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The "original singularity" was not a singularity in the sense of a black hole (ie. sucking things up). Singularity just refers to a point of infinite density and in the case of the big bang just points out that if you reverse the expansion of the universe you will arrive at a point of infinite density. Big bang theory describes everything after that singularity in the same way that evolution describes everything after the onset of life. Some string theories attempt to circumvent or explain it but that's beyond the scope of your question. Also inflationary theory is now widely accepted although it isn't necessary for a big bang scenario (but is necessary for our specific universe).

2007-07-18 08:31:17 · answer #2 · answered by mistofolese 3 · 1 0

Immediately after the Big Bang, all the material has been converted to antimatter - outside our universe, so there is no restriction to outward travel (kinda outward... it is all still in another universe). Then, after an unspecified moment (different for each new cycle), the material begins to cool off and drop into the Real Universe as individual particles.
Thereafter begins the continuous reduction of antimatter, and when the antimatter is virtually gone, then the cycle of collapse begins.

2007-07-18 11:36:26 · answer #3 · answered by science_joe_2000 4 · 0 1

The fabric of the universe itself may have been expanding at a rate greater than the speed of light during a stage called cosmic inflation, which would have enabled objects in the universe to escape the singularity.

2007-07-18 08:14:18 · answer #4 · answered by DavidK93 7 · 2 1

i'm unsure if each man or woman has a physically powerful answer to that query. the rationalization is via fact our brains are only able to finite comprehenstion. whether you have faith in a great bang or in a divine advent, you are going to at last pose the question, "particular, yet what got here approximately *till now* that?" no be counted how a good distance back you go in time, you will discover that there would desire to've been time only till now that... comparable is going with area... no be counted how a good distance you shuttle in one course, there'll constantly be area only previous your spaceship in that comparable course. mutually as the understanding of our universe maintains to boost, i don't think of we are going to ever have all the solutions, except we exchange into as omniscient as our author, whoever that is.

2016-10-21 22:40:14 · answer #5 · answered by jochim 4 · 0 0

The mathematics of it is like really woo woo, and so is the physics, made worse because we don't really know what the laws of physics were at that time. I mean, think of it: time & space, matter & energy, all of what is now the universe, in an infinitesimally small point expanding at some mind blowing rate,... what kind of laws of physics do you think were at work? I'm willing to bet the end of the universe that even the laws of physics were at that time just unravelling.

2007-07-18 08:27:58 · answer #6 · answered by ╡_¥ôò.Hóö_╟ 3 · 0 0

simply put what you mistook for a singularity was in fact all matter condensed infinitely small, but it was not a black hole.
the (bang) was an explosion that we are still expanding from.
there is a theroy that when we stop expanding, we contract and it starts all over again.don't worry we wont be anywere around.

2007-07-18 09:10:17 · answer #7 · answered by insane 6 · 0 0

Science does not suggest there was a Big bang.
This is a philosphical hypothesis which certain scientists try to justify scientifically.
In fact the evidence does not support the BB very well at all.
Many assumptions and artifical constructs are added to make it 'work'. Such as dark energy, dark matter, inflation, etc.

http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3051/

2007-07-18 10:50:59 · answer #8 · answered by a Real Truthseeker 7 · 0 3

Cause all the matter didn't out of one point, but rather from everywhere at the same time.

2007-07-18 08:35:50 · answer #9 · answered by straightshooter 5 · 0 0

Who says it did? There are some who claim our universe, known and unknown, is nothing more than a SUPER black hole. [See source...there are many more.]

2007-07-18 08:23:52 · answer #10 · answered by oldprof 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers