A,C,E cuz they all are in common
2007-07-20 17:36:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥Anonymous♥ 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Fossil records provide supporting evidence for evolution as can genetic and biochemical analyses. Photographs cannot as there are no photos of earlier organisms. Changes in one generation are not evidence for evolution, unless they are in the population as a whole. So, A, C and E.
2007-07-18 15:07:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by N E 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
A=yes, analysis of genetics can show similarities between related organisms.
B=no. Photography hasn't been around long enough to show evolution occuring, since generally it takes much longer.
C=yes, shows how organisms have changed through history
D=No. Changes in one generation are not due to evolution
E=yes. Biochemical similarities can show relationships between organisms.
2007-07-18 15:34:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Monika 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
A. Most certainly. This is a clear evidence.
B. No.
C. Yes. Not as strong as A, but still good evidence.
D. No. This shows mutations and genetical differences in one generation of difference, but it takes much longer for evolutionary changes to kick in.
E. Possibly, but I'm not sure.
2007-07-18 15:07:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by jjsocrates 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
A, C, E all are different lines of evidence which support evolution.
2007-07-18 15:03:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by hcbiochem 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
A, B and C i would say
2007-07-18 15:01:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by greek_girl_25 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with a, c, and e.
2007-07-18 15:06:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joan H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
D
2007-07-18 15:15:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Michel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
c,
2007-07-18 15:00:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋