English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is it possible this allows us to travel into the future don't u think yes ?

2007-07-18 07:13:10 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Physics

14 answers

Sorry to disappoint you but no. The relatively stable orbit of the earth around the sun and the orbit of the moon around the earth are due to a differential in the underlying force of energy determining the form and function of all three systems, in respect to an underlying force of energy referred to as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa).

As the acceleration of (ntffa) is non-resistant an increase in the underlying energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, whereas a decrease in the underlying energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

In respect to the energy potential of each system, the sun has the greater energy potential, with the earth second and the moon third. But because the moon is the smallest of the three, the moon has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass, the earth second and the sun third.

The dynamic relationship existing between the earth and the sun is inversely proportional to the dynamic relationship existing between the earth and the moon.

Also, the internal and external dynamics of all three systems are inversely proportional to each other in relation to the inside and the outside or each system effecting inversely proportional dynamic responses.

It is a differential in energy and resistance which holds the earth in orbit around the sun, in that the sun and the earth exist as separate fields. The sun exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the sun, while the earth also exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the earth. The moon too exists as a unified field of frequency where a non-simultaneous condition of universe remains relative to the condition of the moon.

The earth exists as a unified field existing within the unified field of the sun and as a unified field existing within the unified field of the moon, while the moon exists as a unified field existing within the unified field of the earth and as a unified field existing within the unified field of the sun. The sun exists as a unified field existing within the field of the earth and as a unified field existing within the field of the moon.

The moon having the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass is able to maintain a stable orbit around the earth, while the underlying energy of both the earth and moon continues to accelerate with the moon having the higher rate of field frequency acceleration.

This situation provides both a differential in energy and a differential in resistance affecting the orbit of the moon around the earth.

The moon having the higher rate of (ntffa) is resistant to the acceleration of the earth’s field which is symmetrically focused to the center of the earth.
And because the field of the moon is accelerating faster than that of the earth, the moon is slowly receding away from the earth. This is due to the differential in energy and resistance continuously increasing.

In relation to the earth in orbit around the sun, the earth is resistant to the acceleration of the sun’s field which is symmetrically focused to the center of the sun. And because the field of the earth is accelerating slower than that of the sun, the sun is receding slowly away from the earth, despite the fact that the sun is at the center of the solar field.

It is important to note, that as much as the universe is acceleratively expanding so is the dynamic structure of the sun, earth and moon also expanding in proportion to their rates of field frequency acceleration.

Without a differential in the underlying energy of each system, where the smaller body of mass has the higher ratio of energy to mass it would be impossible for separate bodies of mass to exist, as all the mass of universe would otherwise remain as a single body of mass.

In relation to the ratio of energy to mass, the larger mass always has the greater net energy, while the smaller mass has less net energy but a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

A single block of a single element weighing 100 grams would have more energy than a 50 gram block of the same element, but 100 one gram pieces of the same element would have a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass than either the 100 gram block or the 50 gram block.

In relation to the attraction between two bodies of mass, such as the earth and the moon, an increasing differential in the underlying energy of both bodies decreases the attraction and causes an increase in the space between them.

Although the rate at which the differential in the underlying energy of both bodies increases is very slow it is nonetheless a process of dynamic modulation affecting field control. In other words the process we are searching for which would allow for gravity control is in fact the very process which allows for the moon to remain in orbit around the earth.

As long as the underlying energy of the moon continues to increase the moon will continue to move away from the earth.

In relation to the earth/sun system there is an inverse relationship to that of the earth/moon system, but as the underlying energy of the sun continues to increase, at a much higher rate than either the earth or the moon, the relative dynamic balance existing between the earth and the sun will eventually become unstable and the earth will be forced away from the sun and into a new orbit.

The reason for this is that the earth has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, in relation to the earth/sun system..

2007-07-24 17:14:06 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 3 0

If the Earth's speed were to increase (which could happen to a very minute extent due to an asteroid collision, for example), the Earth would move slightly further from the Sun and it would actually orbit the Sun a little more slowly. It would, however, have a slightly greater angular momentum. (It would be equal to the sum of the original angular momentum of the Earth and the angular momentum of the asteroid.)

For a body that orbits a much more massive body under the influence of gravity, angular momentum is proportional to the square root of the orbital distance. For example, a body with Earth's mass that orbited at four times the distance from the Sun would have two times the angular velocity, since sqrt(4) = 2. This is a consequence of Keppler's inverse square law. So if Earth had a greater angular momentum imparted to it, it would move to the more distant orbit that matches the new momentum. Since an asteroid has a very small angular momentum compared to the Earth, the change in orbit would be very small--on the order of inches. The more significant effects would be to the surface of the Earth at and around the impact site, or globally if enough damage is done.

This would not cause anybody to travel into the future any faster than our current rate, which happens to be exactly one second per second.

2007-07-18 14:16:37 · answer #2 · answered by DavidK93 7 · 3 0

The only way to orbit faster is to orbit closer. The additonal heat from the sun would be somwhat of an inconvenience.

But do not expect time to flow at a different rate, you can slow down time, as perceived by an outside observer, only when traveling at relativistic speed (very close to the speed of light) and there are no such orbit ni the solar system, one would have to orbit the neutron star or a black hole at low altitude for the effect to be noticeable.

2007-07-18 14:30:51 · answer #3 · answered by Vincent G 7 · 1 0

I'm sorry, but the last time I checked, the length of time the Earth took to orbit the sun simply determines the length of a year. If we were somehow able to speed up the Earth's rotation (that would take more energy than we can produce) it would only shorten the year and make everyone need to change calendars.

Not to mention the fact that the climate change that would come about from moving closer to the sun.

2007-07-18 14:22:04 · answer #4 · answered by Bigfoot 7 · 1 0

If everyone would run in the same direction at the same time, the traction of the feet against the soil would cause the earth to spin faster or slow down depending on which direction everone was running. The days would then become slower or faster since the earth would be rotating faster.slower relative to the orbit of the Sun. So in order to increase everyone would have to be running in a direction to slow down the rotation.

2007-07-18 14:19:48 · answer #5 · answered by victorschool1 5 · 2 0

If we somehow managed to increase the earth's speed, then the orbit would be disrupted. The extra linear momentum would likely cause the earth to leave orbit and soar off into the universe.

The current conditions have the earth orbiting around the sun. If the sun's mass were to increase or the earth slowed down, the earth would spiral into the sun. If the sun's mass decreased or the earth sped up, the earth would leave its orbit and soar off into space.

2007-07-18 14:19:24 · answer #6 · answered by Mermaid 2 · 1 0

You can make it orbit faster. Just jump up and down. You won't notice anything, and it will be changing a microscopic amount, and it will be equalized when you land on the earth from jumping, but you will be changing the speed.
For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
If you changed the speed a significant amount, we would fly off into space, or crash and burn in the sun.
Probably not on the time travel.

2007-07-18 14:20:09 · answer #7 · answered by bdc3141 4 · 2 0

We have no technology that would allow us to do this. If somehow we could, it would change Earth's orbit, making the planet less habitable. Our precise distance from the sun is one of the things that allowed life to evolve here.

2007-07-18 14:18:12 · answer #8 · answered by TG 7 · 1 0

If everyone is going to travel into the future at the same time, what would be the point? Everyone at your class reunion would still be the same age as you are. For time travel to be any fun, you have to do it by yourself. Then you can go to your reunion and if anyone shows up they will be decades older than you are.

2007-07-24 13:38:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

WE cannot do this, no. We not only cannot change this but most of us do not know what is going on. If you want to check out more of the advanced science than the world knows of or is aware of, read Oahspe but don't expect to know it all even then. A newer science than is known on earth to date is written up in the automatically written book, Oahspe.

2007-07-25 15:05:50 · answer #10 · answered by kasandra k 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers