English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Assuming its not about oil...

2007-07-18 04:27:49 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Please keep the personal attacks down to a minimum, I want to hear answers about his ideas not about him.

2007-07-18 04:31:50 · update #1

12 answers

He is 100% right and he is an awesome actor and probably my favorite. Our government is controlled by die hard Zionists like Chertoff and Wolfowitz, like someone mentioned above. Wolfowitz was pushing for a war with Iraq since the 90s because he thought Iraq was a threat to Israel, and he was Deputy Secreatry of Defense when the 2003 invasion started. Coincidence? Then, the ACLU and other Zionist-founded organizations were founded to call people like Mel Gibson and to point fingers at him and everyone else who speaks the truth and is against Zionis, a racist. The Zionists are Satanists who are manipulating innocent Jews into creating the New World Order headquarters.

2007-07-18 04:32:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Uh, no. Mel Gibson is pretty crazy. I mean, like Michael Jackson or Mike Tyson crazy.
Truthfully, the Iraq war was probably being considered well before bush took office. I can't see any construable reason why Israel has anything to do with it.

2007-07-18 11:34:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Oooo, as much as I despise the bigoted anti-semitism of Mel Gibson, it is true that we can trace nearly all of our Middle Eastern problems over the past 50 years to Israel's presence in the region. I would rather have the Jewish population here, in America, adding some balance and integrity to offset our fanatics in the South. We have to admit it was strange to force Palestinians out of land they had naturally filled just because people of Jewish heritage had great-great-great-great grandparents that once lived there. This was an example of giving superstitious religion undue respect. Do you think we would allow Syria to establish a Muslim "homeland" in Kansas? No, we'd feel justified in attacking them and their supporters over ... and over .. and over.

2007-07-18 11:59:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Iraq War is about oil, and it's being fought on behalf of the Saudis and wealthy investors in the oil and defense sectors of the US economy.

Without oil, the Middle East is Africa Jr.

2007-07-18 11:49:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes. Oil for Israel.

2007-07-18 11:40:14 · answer #5 · answered by here to help 7 · 1 0

You wonder why so many other countries kicked the Jews out of their governments.

Wolfiwitz
Pearle
Bolton
Chertoff
and on and on

all working for Israel

2007-07-18 11:32:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Didn't Mel Gibsons DAD say that??

2007-07-18 11:42:26 · answer #7 · answered by Frank Dileo 3 · 0 0

I'll agree with Rove on that one. But I'm sure one side would still find some kind of bone to pick.

2007-07-18 11:33:54 · answer #8 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 0 0

not sure if he has it right or not, but it was definitely a stupid idea to give them a state where it is.
If we moved them to the America-Mexico border, most of our problems would be gone, and they could even provide immigration control!

2007-07-18 11:44:21 · answer #9 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1 0

One thing is for sure; we would definitely have more friends in the Middle East.

2007-07-18 11:31:11 · answer #10 · answered by Page 4 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers