From time time we hear that the #2 guy has been captured...then the story falls out of the 'news'. Now we hear that the #1 has been captured. Does anyone actually believe this #$% will make a difference? The resistance in Iraq has dozens of factions..when one fails two more pop up to take its place. At this rate we'll be in Iraq until everything above ground there is blown into #$% and air and all of the people are dead, crippled or living in Miami!
2007-07-18 04:17:52 · 14 answers · asked by Noah H 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They will still replace the bastard with another bastard.
2007-07-18 04:20:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When we capture the #1 guy, the #2 guy then becomes the #1 guy and it has little effect on their operations. It may also do more harm than good. What if the #2 guy that now becomes the #1 guy is more interested in attacking the U.S. then being in Iraq?
2007-07-18 04:22:34 · answer #2 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You've figured out George Bush's propaganda, my friend. That's all it is - propaganda. Al Quaida does not have a command structure like western military organizations do. So saying we caught the number two man or the number one man is meaningless - those who remain un-caught can and do continue their activities as if nothing at all has happened. Here's old George: "Hey, lookie lookie, we caught Numbah One 'n that means our surge is working!" Here's a message for George: We aren't *that* stupid, you friggin' Bozo!
2007-07-18 04:28:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How big of a deck of Cards is the Administration playing with this time ?
probably like Vegas 6 decks? 10 decks?
2007-07-18 04:22:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
we're making enemies faster than we can kill them...
great, we nailed a top operative. there will always be someone there to take his place, and like you said, there are dozens of factions. we can nail the number one or two guy every few weeks and Iraq will still be a violent mess.
2007-07-18 04:22:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
particular he's actual. it is not important if al quada became in iraq formerly it in ordinary terms concerns that they are there now. whilst they chosen to circulate into iraq and address our adult men, it became a blessing. i might lots extremely have them there than in the U. S.. Bush did not create al quada, he in simple terms needs to wreck it
2016-12-14 12:34:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I call that a good start. Now for those of you who think we can not win a war of terror I say, Sure we can, kill all their families, and end of problem. Wipe their DNA off of the face of the planet. No more terrorist and no little terrorist going to grow up to be big terrorist. "Speak softly and carry a big stick. " Teddy Roosevelt
2007-07-18 04:25:25 · answer #7 · answered by libsticker 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So what are you suggesting? That the war on terror is lost, and that we should all just kill ourselves now and save the terrorists the trouble?
You are so weak.
2007-07-18 04:23:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most people believe this is a good thing. Only ignorance would spin this into something negative.
2007-07-18 04:22:19 · answer #9 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is only bad news for those who want America to fail (and you know who you are).
2007-07-18 04:50:21 · answer #10 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
More proof the that surge in American forces is working.
2007-07-18 04:24:57 · answer #11 · answered by mustagme 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋