No of course not that would Not Achieve the Goals of the General Idea! Does the Iranian president go on the Air an point out all the great reasons to be Americas Friend? No and so why do the Libs expect the 100% truth in anything? Isn't that naive?
2007-07-18 03:43:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
boy are u missing the Point.
2007-07-18 03:52:35 · update #1
I don't expect the truth
but i think i deserve the truth
2007-07-18 03:49:55 · answer #1 · answered by conventional 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
A. the american colonists did no longer have representation in British Parliament (British Congress). B. can't be maximum suitable for the reason that they had no plans of Westward enlargement collectively as related to Britain, and whether they did, tax could have very minimum result on something monetary. C. can't be maximum suitable because of the fact taxes have been decrease for the colonists than they have been in Britain. (pass parent). D. can't be maximum suitable because of the fact taxes in straightforward terms did what they say, TAXED them, no longer limited them.
2016-12-10 15:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually - you are being very vague in what you are asking. If you are talking about the Declaration of Independence it would be pretty silly for them to be listing reasons to what grat about being a British Citizens don't you think?
I am not sure why you are making this a liberal vs. conservative argument - can you explain why you have come to this conclusion? It sounds like you heard something and have no jusification for things.
Good luck!!!
2007-07-18 03:59:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There were Americans in the late 18th Century who were very loyal subjects to the British king. They did write pamphlets, and newspaper items that gave reasons for loyalty to the king. There were also the rebels who listed reasons not to be loyal to the king. One of the most famous such documents written by the rebels is something called "The Declaration of Independence". It listed grievances the colonies had with the king and parliament.
2007-07-18 03:52:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There was not many benefits to being a British citizen back then. The Founding Fathers did the right thing and fought for their freedom against tyranny.
2007-07-18 03:49:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you'd like to be a British citizen, feel free.
EDIT:
Boy, I got the point. I just think it's a stupid point. Your point is that there's good with the bad, why aren't we focusing on the good? When the bad SO outweigs the good it becomes an exercise in farce.
"My house burned down with my children inside....but boy did that fire take the chill out of the night"
See?
2007-07-18 03:50:31 · answer #6 · answered by Atavacron 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I wonder if American Colonists would be considered terrorist by 'good citizens' like you? I think the one missing the point is you little girl.
2007-07-18 03:57:08 · answer #7 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not near as naive as thinking we need a second amendment, to prevent government opression, but then accepting every misrepresentation or hiding of the truth as for our own good. see any conflict with that way of thinking??
2007-07-18 03:48:29 · answer #8 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
After the last six years, I don't expect the truth on anything, from our own govt as well as Iran.
2007-07-18 03:48:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
So we are supposed to assume they have brilliant reasons they just aren't sharing based on the fact that the reasons they are sharing are inadequate?
That seems a leap of faith, to me.
2007-07-18 03:48:13 · answer #10 · answered by DAR 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋