To a degree yes. It saddens me that the idiots who write the Sun and the Daily Mail print something, then half the country go "baaa" and agree.
Tragic really.
2007-07-18 03:26:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by GillsMan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The press have played a part but he is mainly to blame.
2007-07-18 14:38:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by James Mack 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think like princess Dianes children they are subject to the media portrayel absolutely but also ALL of what they say cant be ficticious, you know?...there has to be some truth to what was written
2007-07-18 10:17:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by kelly_hotma 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No,bad decisions
2007-07-19 20:24:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by picklechick 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think anyone in a position of power is given bad press.
2007-07-18 10:45:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by zimmj002 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he is a victim of his own vanity, arrogance and lack of judgment. He is also weak and deluded and is George Bush's creature.
2007-07-18 14:21:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Beau Brummell 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What representative isn't? We tolerate sedition like a slum neighborhood tolerates weeds.
Enough.
2007-07-18 10:57:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he were a victim of a vicious press, then it is self inflicted!
2007-07-18 10:13:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tony Blair victim of media? Ho ho ho......
2007-07-18 10:34:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Saucy B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you bet ye.
2007-07-18 23:27:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋