This has been the way that they pay back the people that financed them initially.
PS Those terrorists flew the airplanes into the buildings on "your" watch, as a matter of fact, 'Your people" were told that BinLaden and AlQueda were our biggest threat and they may use planes to attack civilian target
BUT
President George W Bush didn't think that was crucial info so he TOOK THE LONGEST VACATION EVER BY A PRESIDENT after he was elected THEN they hit us.
You didn't see the Democrats blaming Bush 1 for the
1st WTC bombing that happened right after Clinton took office. A job that was planned years beofre it was executed!
NO, the Clinton Administration just put their noses to the wheel and did something!!
Clinton Administration developed the nation's first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator of anti-terrorist efforts.
Clinton Administration stopped the Al Qaeda millennium hijacking and bombing plots.
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to kill the Pope
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up Boston airport
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge
Clinton Administration stopped the planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania
-- Tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).
-- Brought perpetrators of first World Trade Center bombing and CIA killings to justice.
-- Did not blame Bush I administration for first World Trade Center bombing even though it occurred 38 days after Bush left office. Instead, worked hard, even obsessively -- and successfully -- to stop future terrorist attacks.
--Named the Hart-Rudman commission to report on nature of terrorist threats and major steps to be taken to combat terrorism.
-Clinton Administration sent legislation to Congress to TIGHTEN AIRPORT SECURITY. (Remember, this is before 911) The legislation was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the airlines.
-Clinton Administration sent legislation to Congress to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF TERRORIST FUNDING. It was defeated by Republicans in the Senate because of opposition from banking interests.
-Clinton Administration sent legislation to Congress to add tagents to explosives, to allow for BETTER TRACKING OF EXPLOSIVES USED BY TERRORISTS. It was defeated by the Republicans because of opposition from the NRA.
-Clinton Administration increased the military budget by an average of 14 per cent, reversing the trend under Bush I.
-Clinton Administration tripled the budget of the FBI for counterterrorism and doubled overall funding for counterterrorism
-Clinton Administration detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries
-Clinton Administration created national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.
-Of Clinton Administration's efforts says Robert Oakley, Reagan Ambassador for Counterterrorism: "Overall, I give them very high marks" and "The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama"
-Paul Bremer, current Civilian Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley as he believed the Clinton Administration had "correctly focused on bin Laden.
-Barton Gellman in the Washington Post put it best, "By any measure available, Clinton Administration left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him" and was the "first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort"
2007-07-18 02:41:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have to put in that with Reagan, both of those were kept at minimal/impact. (And Papa bush took General Powell's advice. Which left the Iraq I battle concise, decisive, short and to the point.)
Your question is such a- ..well, a good one, it doesn't really need an answer to attach. But now I'm thinking more of
wh?y vague-defined wars used for such raw accumulation of power when republicans are in office?
2007-07-18 02:56:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by roostershine 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
WW II =President Franklin Roosevelt
Korean War= President Harry Truman
Vietnam= Presidents JFK and LBJ
All Democrats!!
Good try though!!
2007-07-18 02:47:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Supercell 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
I vaguely remember FDR having the Great Depression and a World War occurring when he was in office. And I am certain the economy is doing great right now, and that there is no recession or depression, so you are just ranting.
Okay, so I get a thumbs down for stating the truth. Pathetic.
2007-07-18 02:38:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
WW1- Democrat Wilson
WW2- Democrat Roosevelt
Korea- started under Democrat Truman, ended under Republican Eisenhower
Vietnam- started under Democrats Kennedy and Johnson, ended under Republican Nixon.
The largest peace time economic expansion in the history of the world was in the United States during the 1980s under Republican Reagan.
Please educate yourself...
2007-07-18 03:05:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Wasn't FDR president when the Great Depression was going on? I don't think it is Republicans, but it just happened.
2007-07-18 02:47:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by mountaindew25 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
There has been some type of U.S. military use in combat areas for (at least) the last 60 years... this span covers every administration, both Republican and Democrat.
2007-07-18 02:44:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Political bigotry is alive and well.
Actually, it's because my party has become anti-business and anti-war.
When our economy starts going bad, we call in the Republicans.
When we are threatened by outside forces, we call in the Republicans.
Why would you put a party that is anti-war or anti-business in power when things are bad?
When those things are dealt with, they put a democrat back in, as we value our freedoms more than almost anything.
What is unfortunate is the socialist leanings that have taken over my party, such that we are no longer a party about freedom. I fear for our future if we can't get back to the things we have been so successful with.
2007-07-18 02:40:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Republicans were "sitters" and let the economy waggle at will, while the Democrats lead war with "big government", how things change.
2007-07-18 02:44:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by edubya 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah but Democrats have been war mongerers too.
2007-07-18 02:38:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Such as WWII, Vietnam, Somalia, Kosovo?
2007-07-18 02:41:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋