CNN nailed by Moore's proof, admit they screwed up. What say?

Question

Atlast, truth prevails. CNN has admitted that it screwed up with their "facts". Michael Moore's systematic, step-by-step evidence nailed them into admitting their errors (that too on Live TV).

Source: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=217

So what do you Moore haters think? Do you for once see what is the truth or believe that this is some kinda black magic and crap? Are you willing to accept for once that Michael Moore is RIGHT?

Answer 1

No, don't like him so it's hard to believe anything he says. Sadly and I'll admit it, he could be telling the truth and because it comes from him I'll dismiss it.

Answer 2

Don't necessarily dislike him but I do see that he is an extremist who does not really address an issue. His materials are really more propaganda, as is, incidentally, your answer. I saw CNN's reply and the doctor who is their expert said that he had made a numerical mistake and corrected it, apologizing, even though the mistake did not make much difference in the response had had previously made. So to say that Moore nailed CNN is a gross exaggeration of the facts (kind of Moore like too). They did admit even a small mistake in their response and that is to be admired in a world where people (like Moore and like the asker) try to force ideas down the throat of us all and do so by using exaggeration and bullying tactics. Ironically, the same kind of things that the radical right does. Left and right becomes the same thing when they are on the extreme. I would still love to hear Mr. Moore's explanation for sending the young American to Iraq on a mission of trying to prove that (1) the Iraqi extremists were not dangerous and (2) that the US security forces would not even know he was there. He was murdered by being beheaded by one group or another. Moore was forced to acknowledge that he had sent the kid to Iraq but never responded to accepting any kind of responsiblity for his subsequent death. Moore was funny at one time but as he is pressured to represent the radical left, his work fails to impress as much as it did at one time. Still would like to know about the kid he got killed though.

Answer 3

Micheal Moore is jerk who is only interested in getting attention for himself. No reason to believe him, just because he has money he has a louder voice than the rest of us dosen't make him right. Everybody gets lucky now and then so I am sure he is right by accident. Why not so much crap comes out of him eventually he will accidentally be right occasionally but it isn't from effort on his part. I personally would like to make a big poster of him standing next to a bunch of starving Somalians and post at the bottom so Micheal you really think you spend your money and efforts well while the rest of the world starves and suffers you use your money to make an *** out of yourself, he is just as greedy and useless as the people he wastes his money attacking.

Answer 4

I would believe Michael Moore before I would believe anyone I heard on CNN.

Answer 5

Michael Moore isn't much more than a semi-informative entertainer. I haven't seen the new movie, but if its on par with the veracity of "Roger and Me", "Bowling for Columbine" and "Fahrenheit 9/11" then it is probably a bunch of garbage. I'll watch it and give it a chance, but Moore has given us plenty of evidence that he prefers a smooth narrative to actual facts. He has long since proved that he has no credibility.

Answer 6

I heard that Dr.Gupta made some sort of back handed apology but nothing major. Was there more than that.

Christopher: I just wanted to say I applaud your honesty. I can really appreciate that sentiment..