example 1 : If someone is on a school bus travelling at 60 MPH, and then she gets up and walks forward, her speed is 1 MPH, how do you record the speed of the person?
Is her speed 60 mph, 61 mph or should you list it at both velocities : 60 mph + 1 mph.
My thought on this is that speed is relative. Someone on the bus observes her travelling at 1 mph, but someone off the bus observes her at 61 mph (I'm assuming). To account for this you record the speed at 60 +1 mph so that someone looking at the record sees there are two different velocities.
Second example: Someone is travelling in a car and fires a gun that is perfectly perpendicular to their forward direction.
Not accounting for any wind resistance, will the bullet continue to move in the direction of the car?
My guess is that bullets leaving this moving object would form a diagonal (triangle with direction of car, intended direction of bullet and actual direction of bullet. Thoughts from physics students?
2007-07-18
02:17:55
·
5 answers
·
asked by
loboconqueso
2
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Physics
Alright, so based on the fact that it appears that I'm right, doesn't this mean that shooters have a much greater challenge than the movies portray when trying to shoot from moving objects (aside from the fact that movies always get their stuff wrong)?
I would think if a bullet is continuing to travel forward and in its own direction that the shooter has 0 chance of hitting a target that's perpendicular to forward motion. (because even if the target were perfectly sited, the bullet will travel ahead of the target)
I would also think that the best way to guarantee accuracy in shooting, then, is to make sure that when you are shooting that you want your bullet to travel as close to the true forward direction of the moving vehicle as possible. Seems to me then that the problem with accuracy will get worse the closer to perpendicular the barrell of the gun will be.....right ?
2007-07-18
02:57:14 ·
update #1