Why does wikipedia allow this type of antisemitism?

Question

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion

Answer 1

Wiki has zero credibility whatsoever.

Answer 2

Wikipedia write down all type of facts. Nothing on the link provided suggests the wikipedia is antisemitism. It just shows an explanation and history to link to up the dates. WE are not going to change facts in history to be political correct and not hurt any race or religion.
For crying out loud it's like the palistines saying the holucost never existed.

Answer 3

You don't stop antisemitism or any other form of discrimination by keeping quiet about it.It's essential to talk about and expose these types of negative destructive idea's and that's exactly what this article seems to be doing.
"It is one of the most well known and discussed examples of literary forgery.

Numerous independent investigations have proven it to be a plagiarism and a hoax."....
Continued usage of the Protocols as an antisemitic propaganda tool substantially diminished with the defeat of the Nazis in World War II. It is still frequently quoted and reprinted by some antisemitic circles, and is sometimes used as evidence of an alleged Jewish cabal, especially in the Middle East."

Exposing antisemitism is not the same as supporting it.

Answer 4

I have this suspicion that you are not really Jewish - purely because the questions you ask are so weird.

You cannot have failed to read in the link you present that Wikipedia is STATING that the Protocols is a forgery and that it's racist - so why post this question?

I've just seen another rather strange question from you also.

Not sure what you're about, but I know something is not quite right.

Answer 5

erm...you do know that The Protocols has long since been known to be a complete fabrication, don't you?

Besides, the fact that The Protocols existed is a fact. That is why it is listed there.

There is no law requiring everyone to like every other group of people. Hate exists; that is unfortunate, but people need to accept that fact and then get over it.

Answer 6

They're not supporting antisemitism. Wikipedia is a forrum that gives you information about anything and everything you want to know about. If you don't want to know about it, dont look it up. The link you provided is strictly giving information about that particular documentary, not supporting its views. You're either trying to read too much into it or trying to get other people to do that.

Answer 7

Actually I have a hard time seeing how this particular thing is Anti-Semitic. Did I miss something? After all the article clearly debunks the book as nothing more than a propaganda tool for those wanting to promote Anti-Semitism.

AD

Answer 8

Whatever do you mean?

It's listed in Wikipedia in order to show it as the vile antisemitic propaganda it is.

There are Muslims and other gutter-dwellers the world over who believe the "protocols" to be truth. One must fight such ignorance and intellectual poverty with the truth.

Answer 9

Wikipedia has done nothing wrong... if you don't like the idea behind the book you need to protest the book not Wikipedia. I'm sure you've heard the old saying "Don't shoot the messanger". Wikipedia is only one of millions of data sources. Get over it... protest the book not Wikipedia.

Answer 10

This book is one of two that are best sellers in the Islamic world Guess what the other is Hint it was written while he was in jail in the 1930s' Nice huh

Answer 11

Doesn't it say that the book it literary forgery? I mean I'm not defending the anti-Semitic info in the article but at the beginning it tells you the book is false correct?