2007-07-17 22:38:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
No.... they screwed up by drafting Vicks overrated @$$. He never was good and he just runs around looking like hes chasing an invisible KFC on wheels.
2007-07-17 23:01:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Without a doubt. In fact i think they should have gotten rid of Michael Vick and kept Schaub. I think Schaub is a better quarterback in the true sense of the word and they would have saved a boat load of money by dumping Vick and they would have gotten just as much if not more production from Schaub.
2007-07-18 01:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by mruniverse169 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Schaub commerce exceeded off a pair of weeks previously the full Vick factor went down. They theory that they could have Vick for this 12 months and various different extra destiny years, plus Schaub became going to be a unfastened agent after this 12 months. They moved up 2 spots with their first %. interior the 1st around, and that they have got been given one extra first around %.. you could no longer call that stupid. Any group interior the league could have made that pass.
2016-12-10 15:34:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES... simple as that!
The Falcons would do better now to trade for Randle El from the Redskins... i have seen him throw touchdown passes miore accurately and in more clutch moments than Vick!!
Gotta love the HB Fk WR Reverse Pass... remember the 05 Superbowl....Randel El 40 odd yards to Ward...TD baby!
2007-07-18 04:41:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought they did even before all this. Michael Vick was never, ever that good of a quarterback in the NFL. But I'm a Jets fan, so its their problem, I dont care.
2007-07-18 01:31:06 · answer #5 · answered by J-Far 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Im sure had they looked into the future and seen that Vick was gonna get in all this trouble, they would of never let him go in the first place.
2007-07-17 23:10:32 · answer #6 · answered by martin_rulz6 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I thought they did when it first happened. I thought Vick was overrated in the first place. Would make a good RB BUT is a TERRIBLE QB.
2007-07-18 01:45:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hind site is always 20-20.
2007-07-18 00:33:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
C'mon Shockley...
:P
2007-07-18 01:14:00 · answer #9 · answered by Southpaw 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LMAO oh yeah
2007-07-17 22:41:31 · answer #10 · answered by Griff 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋