I mean, he did actually shoot somebody, once again, he also could've killed somebody, he didn't have a hunting license and was drinking. But they just swept that under the rug. But here's Vick, he supposedly fought dogs and i see some people saying he should rot in prison. Makes no sense how people look over what Cheney did, but want to crucify Vick...actually it makes perfect sense, i know exactly why the Cheney incident was forgotten in a couple of days.
2007-07-17
16:23:18
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Sports
➔ Football (American)
I'm not denying what OJ COULD'VE done, it wasn't proven, and i don't know, i wasn't there. Don't try and act like the black and white issue doesn't exist either, because it does. Vick was wrong, if he did it, yes. But that's if he did it. Cheney actually did shot somebody. Now, justify that.
2007-07-17
16:39:31 ·
update #1
Yeah, it was an accident, and he was drinking. So i suppose they should let drunken drivers off the hook if the ACCIDENTALLY kill somebody in a wreck. That was a very sad justification, you gotta come better than that.
2007-07-17
16:41:02 ·
update #2
Barbarella, i respect your comment. It should be equal, you are right.
2007-07-17
16:41:46 ·
update #3
So its okay for people to walk around with shotguns, and be drunk, and shoot somebody. That's okay if its an accident. What if the guy woul've died? Then what? I guess you say, "Oh well, life goes on." But let somebody kill Sparky the german shepard, all hell breaks loose. Do you really value a dog's life over a human's? You are the one that's sick. And oh by the way, we do have firearms in the house. As a matter of fact i was in the Air Force, and we actually shot guns, wow, like nobody has a gun but you. Do you get off on that s#it. You're the type of dude that probably pays more attention to your guns than a female. Pathetic.
2007-07-17
16:59:18 ·
update #4