Why do all of the democrats think that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. It just pisses me off that they all think that Bush did it. You people make me sick. He murdered thousands of people, hell he was proud of it. Then you people come in and blame everything on George Bush. Really, I'm about to cry aboout the statements of Hillary, and every other person who thinks Bush killed those people.
2007-07-17 12:18:04 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Saddam may not have had anything specifically to do with 9/11 but he was harboring and more importantly supporting terrorists. The atrocities of the regime were beyond anything the world had seen since Hitler and Stalin. 400 babies a day died in Iraq due to basic lack of medical care. The special investigator who went to try to find the WMD's said that while he could find no evidence of new WMD's, what he did find was much worse and more dangerous...a society on the brink of total collapse. American policy turned to regime change during the Clinton Administration, and Saddams financial support for terrorism was beyond just passive involvement. Bush removed him from power, 75% of the American public supported the invasion at the time, and today the world is safer without him in power.
2007-07-17 13:27:28 · answer #1 · answered by The Scorpion 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Keep your sanity and do whatever you can to promote the truth. There are lies in both parties, but, the anti Bush rhetoric is out of control. Some are too lazy to look up the comments of Saddam at the time of 9/11. Some just blindly follow without any notion of the truth. The George Soros controlled Democratic party has only two goals. Destroy George Bush and win the 2008 Presidential election. Fighting for the truth will be harder than accepting the lies.
2007-07-17 12:23:50 · answer #2 · answered by meathead 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saddam didn't have anything to do with 9/11 and neither did Bush. NOT ALL LIBERALS ARE CONSPIRACY THEORISTS GUINNESS! People like you make me sick...accusing me of saying Bush did 9/11....have I ever said that...no. Yea Saddam did murder people in his country but he STILL HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11 EVEN THE 9/11 COMMISSION SAYS SO AND IF YOU THINK OTHERWISE YOU ARE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST! The point is yeah there are alot of vicious people being oppressed by their leaders but we cannot come to the rescues of every one! Especially when that was not even the mission. You are really uninformed and skewed...in fact you are making me cry (from laughter) because you actually think all liberals blame Bush for 9/11...not that is SICK!
2007-07-17 12:30:32 · answer #3 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off Saddam and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, read the 9/11 investigatory reports. Second off Sadam did kill thousands of people, but Bush is also responsible for the death of thousands of Iraqi civilians. Saddam and Bush are pretty much on the same page. George Bush's failure to act prior to 9/11 is why a lot of people blame him.
2007-07-17 12:35:52 · answer #4 · answered by MattMan 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Um, maybe because the 9/11 Commission determined that Saddam had nothing to do with it!
Your claim that all Democrats think Bush was responsible for 9/11 is...how to put it nicely....stupid and ignorant. He was responsible for not taking action on the warnings of 9/11 (Presidential Daily Briefing, anyone?), but not responsible for the attack itself.
2007-07-17 12:20:24 · answer #5 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Saddam really didn't have anything to do with 9/11, directly. He was a secular fascist dicator, not an Islamist. After the first gulf war, he did, indeed, Islamize his rhetoric, and start given checks to the families of suicide bombers, to curry favor with the radicals, but that was a long way from the active help and sponsorship provided by Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia.
2007-07-17 12:22:42 · answer #6 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a Democrat, and I don't think that either Saddam or GWB had anything to do with 9/11. Also, I will tell you that I plan to vote for a Republican for President in 2008 as our candidates are poor.
2007-07-17 12:22:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
In the first place, Saddam Hussein and Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11....nada, zip.....
Secondly, only the "conspiracy nutjobs" think that Bush had something to do with it....those who only have half a brain.
Thirdy, Bush is an evil man who is psychologically unfit to be President. He invaded Iraq illegally for control of the oilfields and to oust Saddam Hussein because Hussein insulted his father......That is IT.
Bush has destroyed the country of Iraq, destroyed it's cities, homes, museums, villages, marketplaces, schools, mosques and is he is directly responsible for the needless deaths of 3600 young American soldiers and almost 1 million Iraqi men, women and children.
Bush has ignored the Constitution, ignored the advise of top military professionals (who told him not to go into Iraq - and what would happen if he did), ignored Congress and has contempt for them, ignored we, the people.
He is a tyrant who is the most dangerous man in the world......and he has been responsible for more deaths than all of the terrorists combined.
2007-07-17 13:03:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
because saddam had nothing to do with 9/11
ever read the 9./11 commision?
(just because he killed others doesn't give people the right to kill him)
2007-07-17 13:28:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's all in the name of GREED!
The DEMOCRATS care less about those who are in need!
DEMOCRATS care less that someone right now over in Iraq somewhere is being kicked in the head, by some stupid terrorist!!
And it's all over MONEY, MONEY, MONEEEEEEY! POWER, CONTROL!!
They are tighter than the bark on a tree!!
So, I will say this, WE HAVE SEEN THE ENEMY! And he is the DEMOCRATS!
2007-07-17 12:25:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋