English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How much better is the second processor? I won't be using the laptop for any major gaming, but I will be using it for other multimedia. Is it worth the 50$ upgrade, or will the 1st option be just as good for my purposes?

1.) Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo processor T7100 (1.80 GHz, 2 MB L2 Cache, 800MHz FSB)

2.) Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo processor T7300 (2.00 GHz, 4 MB L2 Cache, 800MHz FSB)

2007-07-17 09:38:15 · 6 answers · asked by mhovanes21 2 in Computers & Internet Hardware Laptops & Notebooks

6 answers

To put it simply, the more L2 cache you have, the less time the processor needs to hit the slower system memory (RAM) to access data.

To know if it is worth it, you really need to know if the applications you will be using will even support multiple processors. Some applications will still only use one processor even if there are 2 available since they are not coded to use both.

2007-07-17 09:44:58 · answer #1 · answered by normanmoy 3 · 0 0

For $50 it is surely worth the upgrade.

Cache memory is expensive, and the increase in performance seen between the two you listed is going to be very noticeable.

2007-07-17 09:43:38 · answer #2 · answered by Bjorn 7 · 2 0

in case you do, a real looking volume of three-d graphical rendering then it somewhat is better to decide for the T8100 with the swifter clock speed and greater Cache for $50 greater or you ought to save some money with the T7250 and spend greater $$ on ram and have the device rigidity, don’t purely think of approximately what programme you're working now bear in innovations each and every of the utility in recent times is greater stressful on the device components and is as much as date somewhat oftentimes, the final element you prefer is to have digital reminiscence getting used on the HDD. look at is as an investment for the destiny, how a lot greater is it going to cost you to enhance at a later date (a lot greater $) than now, plus you're making it a sprint greater destiny data…..properly a minimum of a pair of weeks besides. I’ve use Bryce 4.5, I now think of they are one 6 and that i take advantage of ArtificeDesignWorkshop for walk concept Loft layout and that they suck the existence out of my laptop’s components so in case you may have the money for it decide for the T8100. Ever concept approximately the two x Intel Core2 extreme Quad QX9775 OverClocked Silent Water Cooling @+-3.60GHz-1600FSB 12288KB L2 Cache Quad-center VT EM64T at $4,000approx (comedian tale) yet what appropriate to the Quad-center Intel Xeon E5410 2.33GHz 1333FSB 12MB L2 Cache EM64T or Intel center 2 Duo T8300 cellular 2.40GHz Socket 478 800MHz bus or for an identical money properly in the united kingdom the place we get ripped off each and every of the time Intel center 2 Duo cellular T7300 2.0GHz Socket 478 800MHz bus L2 Cache 4 in case you prefer it on the circulate e8500 with 6mb L2 3.16ghz and a stunning 1333mhz or greater sense able the E8190 with 2.66ghz yet does not help Intel VT. i'd be incorrect notwithstanding it look you may desire to think of greater approximately what motherboard to get because of the fact the boards with a 478 socket your already on the perfect off that CPU selection and are leaving your self no room to enhance without changing the board at greater fee. in case you're extreme approximately 3-d rendering decide for an more desirable motherboard and improve to CPU at a later date or wait slightly a save slightly greater to get the better Chipset and CPU, additionally in 6 months time the extreme or Intel center 2 Quad selection would be a lot much less or maybe the the Xeon X3220 2.40GHz Socket 775 1066MHz would be decrease than you're keen to pay now. purely dont rush out and purchase, i understand its tempting and thrilling getting a clean laptop, purely dangle hearth for slightly.

2016-09-30 05:11:45 · answer #3 · answered by raj 4 · 0 0

very small difference >1-10% increase in processing speed depending on the application.

2007-07-17 09:44:02 · answer #4 · answered by jacksonphisig 4 · 0 1

I concur with Bjorn--spend the extra $50.

2007-07-17 09:48:23 · answer #5 · answered by Mathsorcerer 7 · 0 1

yeah iuts worth the upgrade

2007-07-17 09:44:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers