$32.49
$0.44 per pound
2600 per 100 pound = 26 per pound
1920/26 = 73.85 pounds
73.85*0.44 = $32.49
2007-07-17 09:31:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by yerffej89 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
to find the cost of 1 washer then multiply by 1920 will give you the answer.
to do that find how many washers in 1 lb:
2600/100= 26 washers in 1 lb
0.44/26=0.016923 $/washer, this times 1920= $32.49
2007-07-17 16:34:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by 037 G 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
OK, so 2600 pieces in a 100 lb. box is equal to 26 pieces per pound (divide by 100).
Divide 1920 pieces by 26 pieces per pound to find the number of pounds (1920/26= approx 73.85 pounds)
Multiply 73.85 pounds x .44 per pound.
73.85 x.44 = $32.49
2007-07-17 16:32:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mitchell . 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
2600 in a 100 lb box = 26 per 1 pound box.
1920/26 = 73.85 (1 pound boxes)
.44 cents per pound x 73.85 boxes = $32.49
And... I agree with the woman above.... it took like 10 seconds to do this problem. It took longer to type it than it did to do that math. I use to get my homework done by copying from other people... but when you get in college.... those tests are gonna get you!
2007-07-17 16:31:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by SoulRebel79 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
1920 washers * ( 100 lbs / 2600 washers) * ($0.44 / 1 lb) =
1920 * (100/2600) * $0.44 =
1920 * (1/26) * 44/100 =
192 * (1/26) * 44/10 = About $32.49
2007-07-17 16:31:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
2600 pcs = 100lbs
26 pcs = 1lb
1920/26= 73.846 ... rounded up to 73.85
.44 x 73.85 = $29.54
if you leave the answer 1920/26 = 73.846153 x .44 = $32.49
2007-07-17 16:32:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by alwyzsunny 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The weight of 1920 pieces would
W = (1920 / 2600) * 100 = 73.85 pounds
They would cost 0.44*73.85 = $32.49 .
2007-07-17 16:31:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by anobium625 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
$12, one must assume the washers are damaged in a partially filled box, thus the discount,
2007-07-17 16:36:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why not spend the same amount of time on your math homework as you have posting this question and waiting on answers. You'd probably have figured it out already, and been a little bit smarter than you are as of now.
2007-07-17 16:31:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by AMY 4
·
3⤊
1⤋