Only a fool wouldn't.
What we disagree on is what those crimes are and if they are really crimes.
The "Hate America" crowd is no longer cool, by the way.
We're tired of it.
2007-07-17 08:29:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope- a record from a undeniable raconteur isn't a appropriate assertion, and is even much less power than a Gerneral assembly ruling. so as many biased comments because of the fact the UN lapdogs produce, they are going to all finally end up being meaningless because of the fact the sole place something significant happens is interior the seucrity council the place the Arab bloc isn't able to effect the balloting througgh weight of numbers. The UN popular assembly has ebcome a humorous tale with the sole factor counting being who you want to be pals with and comfortable as much as.
2016-10-04 00:49:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US in America know little about the covert ops of the Govt and the elite groups that run Govts for their own advantage.
So NO, I'm sure the average American would be against ANY crime against humanity while special interest corps find it necessary.
Are all Germans responsible for WWII-no many were in fear of not supporting the plan pushed on Hitler by Industrialists. Look it up, it's on the Internet.
2007-07-17 08:56:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by truthorcon 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Do you mean us as in the people of the USA or that the USA is responsible for crimes against humanity and nature? The US if frequently at war, so war crimes do happen, I don't think that it is the people's fault for that. As far as the crimes against nature, yes, the American govt and the American people are both responsible because we elect anti-environmentalists like W. Bush for higher political office and we are the most wasteful people in the history of our planet!
When we have tens of millions of people driving solo to work in gas guzzling autos, we are responsible for the polution and the destruction of our environment.
2007-07-17 08:34:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Shane 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
In what way You need to be more specific here. Will our country be a criminal if we litter mount Fuji? If we don't personally stop the murders in Darfur as we responsible for the crimes against humanity? You need to rethink you stance there.
2007-07-17 08:29:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Back up your claims.
Just to educate you: The U.S. has more legislation protecting human rights than any other government. We donate more money, food, emergency supplies, medicine, education and aid than any other nation on this earth and to more places of need. We spend more money on medical research to combat disease and illness than anyone else. The extent and enforcement of our environmental protection laws surpass those of any other nation.
Do you even know what you are talking about?
2007-07-17 08:28:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Voice of Liberty 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
We don't commit crimes against humanity and there is no such thing as a "crime against nature".
Thank you for playing. We have some wonderful parting gifts for you.
2007-07-17 08:30:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mathsorcerer 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course you are responsible, you voted for your government
2007-07-17 08:29:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shanahan 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
what is the US in America? Your question makes no sense.
2007-07-17 08:29:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What are the crimes that you're belly-aching about ?
2007-07-17 08:30:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋