English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We have come to a point in society where it is important not just to choose a presidential candidate on a superficial level (e.g., party, issues, hair). As a member of the Solyent Green party and with the US 2008 presidential election looming:

I would like to know which candidate do you feel has the most nutritional value (once converted into tasty crackers)?

And why would you encourage others to consume them?

2007-07-17 06:42:14 · 6 answers · asked by Todd 7 in Politics & Government Elections

6 answers

Well, if only Clinton actually *had* inhaled, I'd say we nominate him and make magic brownies!

2007-07-17 07:14:58 · answer #1 · answered by Cinnibuns 5 · 2 0

I would like to come forward with my choice for the Soylent Green Party's 2008 candidate...

http://www.irwincorey.org/

2007-07-17 13:53:06 · answer #2 · answered by TD Euwaite? 6 · 2 0

I'd say John Kerry for all of the Omega-3 nutrients. I mean he and all of his other flip-floppity friends have that going for them thus making them nutritious.

2007-07-17 13:47:14 · answer #3 · answered by MrOrph 6 · 1 0

Soylent Green is people.

2007-07-17 13:44:22 · answer #4 · answered by crushinator01 5 · 1 0

Too bad Kennedy is not running. I can see him on a spit with an apple in his mouth.

2007-07-17 13:51:14 · answer #5 · answered by booman17 7 · 1 0

I think that it would have to be Giuliani...he is light and fluffy (full of hot air) and I am watching my weight.

2007-07-17 13:45:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers