Suspension does not necessarily equate to dismissal. It is possible the manager is suspected of something they are investigating to try and determine the truth, therefore they have nothing yet to tell him. It's only one day according to your question so he doesn't even have the time needed to file a successful protest. I think they should have told him the circimstances under which the decision was made but I would wait the day and find out what happens before getting too upset. If then, he was not given an explanation or summarily dismissed because of unproven rumor or the like, I would advise him to contact his union or the labor board and file formal complaints against them.
2007-07-17 05:51:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Robert P 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you arent the manager then its not for you to know. But believe me that person will have been told why they are suspended too many employment laws covering all of that sort of thing mean the company would have to be very careful how they handle the situation.
And should you be interviewed about the situation tell the truth and dont elaborate on things you may have heard on the rumour mill. If the manager has been suspended due to dishonesty or something like that they need to have a fair hearing.
A company I worked for tried to "stitch up " a manager once and it wasnt very pleasant for the rest of us we were made to feel like criminals. Interviews and all sorts took place turned out this person had been following procedures and none of the staff had been in the wrong because we did as instructed but he had been helping himself to the lost property some of which was quite valuable.
So unless it involves you I sincerely suggest you keep out of it and just get on with your work as normal.
2007-07-17 05:55:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by BigMomma2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depending on where you live, it may be that you are in a "right to work" or "employment at will" region. These laws give employers the right to suspend or terminate employees without written notice and without prior warning. A suspension can be used to investigate issues that have been reported by other employees or suspected by the employer. If the employee is not terminated after the suspension they may be entitled to pay for work time lost. The employee, however, can be terminated at any time during the suspension. In that case the employee may be eligible for unemployment aid, but most employers will fight this whenever possible.
2007-07-17 06:01:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by bigOmax 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think the answer is legally no, they cannot. But there are many places that people have the misfortune to work for that are ethically barren and operate within their own agenda and outside the law. It's a shame that this person seems to work for such a place. Tell him to contact the Citizen's Advice Bureau as soon as possible, or a union, if he's part of one. If it's a big chain of stores, he should also contact head office, as they might not know what's going on. Give him all my very best, and let us know how he gets on.
2007-07-17 05:53:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by TracylovesABBA 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sorry, yet you will desire to continuously open a till ultimately after closed. in case you probable did not know how, you will desire to have observed as your supervisor or supervisor over and defined which you closed too rapidly and unable to place in the till ultimately. then you definitely walked away and left it there? optimum companies have a insurance that they won't write you up for particular parts, short or over, yet over that quantity will. So on your case they see the be conscious it is not on your till ultimately on the CCTV and coincidentally a matching quantity short. And confident like yet yet another poster pronounced, for the duration of using taking small parts, an worker would desire to finally finally end up taking lots over a volume of time and the organization won't discover out. a pal who works in retail counseled me that worker theft is approximately 33% and shopper theft is in simple terms around 15%, so because it is the reason that employers watch workers or have CCTV. whether you had not taken it, yet yet another co-worker would desire to, a shopper, yet on the comparable time as they stability the books, even the subsequent day or week, would desire to look and because it did not, it is long long gone. Sorry, yet you have not any secure practices. You better want that they don't hearth you. sturdy fulfillment
2016-12-14 11:30:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by lunger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless you are covered by a union contract Employers can suspend/terminate employees (in many states/provinces)without giving cause.
Of course that doesn't prevent the employee from taking action against the employer if they feel they can prove they were terminated unjustly. Employers play the odds, assuming most employees won't expend the time and money to fight the action in court.
2007-07-17 05:50:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by alene1968 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
In UK I think he may have a case for constructive dismissal, But the indicated staff problems leave me a little concerned. I think I would just try to get another job first
2007-07-17 09:58:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Scouse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They can yes. However, I don't see the point.
Suspension is to make a point about some kind of poor performance. I would think they would want the manager to know the reason so that the manager wouldn't do it again, otherwise why wouldn't they just fire them instead.
I would suspect they didn't want the manager to make a scene about it and want to take care of it away from the store.
2007-07-17 05:58:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by ∞ sky3000 ∞ 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Depends on state or country laws, but usually they can send that person home for an investigation. And not tell that person. They I believe have to talk to them within a 24 hour period. I am not positive on that one.
2007-07-17 05:58:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by TBECK 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they can't.
If they have suspended him, they must give him a reason. If they suspect him of anything, then he must be informed of what he has been accused with.
Even though, it is only alleged at this stage, they have the right to be informed.
2007-07-18 07:41:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋