USA HAS OPEN AND PROXY ORGANISATIONS (UN Security council, CIA ETC.,) ALLOVER THE WORLD SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY. USA's ROLE IN NICARAGUA, VIETNAM,LIBYA ,KOREA,PLO,ISREAL,IRAQ,IRAN,INDIA ,PAKISTAN AND IN SO MANY OTHER COUNTRIES' POLITICAL,ECONOMIC AND COMMERCIAL REALMS ARE EXPLICIT AS PERIODICAL REPORTS ARE PREPARED BY THE USA ABOUT THE VARIOUS REGIONS AND COUNTRIES AND PRESENTED TO THE USA CONGRESS AND SENATE. WHILE IN THIS WAY THE USA DESIRES TO HAVE A SAY IN THIS GLOBE, WHY NOT USA CONSIDER ELECTION OF ITS PRESIDENT, CONGRESS AND SENATE THROUGH A GLOBAL POLL IN WHICH ALL THE PEOPLE OF ALL THE COUNTRIES DIRECTLY PARTICIPATE? AFTERALL, USA IS ONLY INTERESTED IN A FREE AND DEMOCRATIC WORLD. IF USA IS NOT DOING THIS, IT HAS NO RIGHT TO ACT AS A WORLD COP? DONT YOU AGREE?
2007-07-17 04:08:37 · 8 answers · asked by viswamvishnu 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
we wouldn't have to meddle if other countries could solve their own damn problems
2007-07-17 04:22:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If some one ask me "who is the most fool in this world..." then I will definitely recommend your name.
We the Indians do not have the right to vote for our own president [and one lady who in the name of CHOOONIYA migrated to Indians from Italy is fixing up the next president of India for our country] in this juncture how can we helpless people of this country think of voting for USA president???
2007-07-17 11:24:56 · answer #2 · answered by NUPAKRY 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the President of the United States represents the people of the United States, and not the world.
No I do not agree.
2007-07-17 11:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by Calvin 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because our meddling in the rest of the world's affairs, as understandably offensive as that is, does not extend to the world the right to meddle in our domestic policy, and we are not going to create two offices of president for domestic and foreign policy leadership.
You grievamce is understandable; your expectation is absurd.
2007-07-17 11:14:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is very interesting and satarical question. The humour of the questioner on the present unfortunate state of affairs of the Globe is worth appreciating.
2007-07-17 14:23:29 · answer #5 · answered by chandraprakash 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree however it has to be entire universe, so until we can't reach boundaries of the universe and visit all planets we can't claim democracy, so let's wait.
2007-07-17 11:28:47 · answer #6 · answered by Serpent G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Muslims would love you for such a system! The whole Muslim world would vote for a muslim and drag along with it their known agenda. NO WAY.
2007-07-17 11:32:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No i dont agree with you.
2007-07-17 13:12:21 · answer #8 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋