I am not really sure if the losing generals in the beginning of the war even had a party. We know that after the war Grant was a Republican but I really see no listing of party connections for all the generals on the Northern side. If you have one I would be glad to see it.
2007-07-17 05:45:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by ALASPADA 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Michele, you couldn't be more wrong. Lincoln was known for reaching out to those who didn't think like him. He appointed his political enemies into his cabinet, and his administration was rife with checks and balances that he created (a model for any real democratic republic).
2007-07-17 11:03:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pfo 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
The absolute answer is yes, he had that Good Republican Sherman show those Dems how to fight a war, and then ohhh golly, miss molly, the south found out that " War is Hell."
2007-07-17 10:58:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by grinslinger 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Lincoln surrounded himself with people who didn't agree with him. that was a LEGACY of his, and probably the reason the civil war was won. What are you talking about? I hate the fact that so many wish their party had power, no matter how they got it, no matter how bad it is for the whole of america. Truly sickens me.
2007-07-17 10:58:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
2⤋
Yes What did he say"you you don't want to use the army I should like to use them?"
2007-07-17 10:58:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
oh you are trying to insinuate that we are weak when it comes to war.. like how we are the only party to be in power and win a war in the last 100 years.. oh wait... that doesn't sound like it meshes with what you are saying at all....
2007-07-17 10:56:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by pip 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
YOU AND GEORGE W SHOULD GO BACK TO THAT ERA
IT SEEMS THAT HIS INTELLECT IS PAR WITH THE 1800'S
2007-07-17 10:55:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋