Is it true that the original leaders "elected" by the people in Iraq were replaced by us???

Question

I heard this and wanted to check the validity.
Were those quasi-elections GW's idear of freedom?

Answer 1

Of course it was, if you know anything about that election you would know that when the ballots were finished being counted and the president was elected there was a big riot over there and it reminded me a lot like the election here. Remember when we had our elections, there was a lot of people here upset and the ballots had to be recounted? Nobody could believe that GW Bush was elected again. It was the same reaction over there. Of course it was covered up, how could the US admit to such fraud, but it was definitely someone elected that the US wanted. If someone else was elected, they wouldn't have been so supportive of the US being there. If the US was so legitimate with the election over there, why wasn't some of the ballots counted, why were there excuses as to why a huge majority of the ballots were invalid. Shouldn't everybody have been able to vote? Everybody on here looks at facts, "Well we have no solid proof that fraud on the US part was ever commited, so it never happened!" That's a lie, people need to open their eyes and look at facts. The US is twisted.

Answer 2

What do you mean by "quasi-elections"? They had a higher voter turn out than America ever has. I am beginning to wonder if you actually "heard" any such thing. It is quite a jump from wanting to check the validity of something one hears and in the next sentence calling them quasi-elections and implying the president of the USA committed a fraud.

I think the first time you heard it was when you said it.

.

.

Answer 3

There were no "free elections" in Iraq under Saddam.....everyone was appointed by him!!!
Ya really need to do a little research before making invalid statements!

Answer 4

good one