Answer: I.R.A. and retirement accounts are heavy in the stock market...Both seem to win under Bush...
That's probably over your head isn't it!
2007-07-17 01:42:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Your source is myspace...enough said but I am going to continue. Bush won the 2000 election by ELECTORAL VOTES. You do not need to win the popular vote inorder to win the presidency, the case of 2000. In 2004, Bush won the Popular vote and the Electoral vote which would clearly give him the presidency, Again. The stock market is reaching record highs for several reasons, the general population is confident with their money, meaning that they feel as if they can spend more disposable income, consumer spending drives the economy. This is a fiscal policy, cut taxes to keep money in the pockets of those who earn it to spend and keep the economy rolling. Bush's tax cuts allows people to keep more meaning they have more to spend, thus booming the economy. BTW, you can not rig a stock market, it is completely random but you can outline general trends. Just pay attention, one day it is up, the next it is down.
2007-07-17 01:54:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course it is. Like Enron, there will come a time when the markets collapse and the 401K investors will be left holding the bag.
------------------------------
Whcwarrior,
Bush isn't smart enough to rig anything, but those he serves are.
"The real rulers of Washington are Invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes." - Justice Felix Frankfurter - US Supreme Court Justice
"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." - J. Edgar Hoover
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop OUR PLAN for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual ELITE and World Bankers is surely preferable to the national auto - determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller CFR Kingpin, Founder of the Trilateral Commission
---------------------------
The Plunge Protection Team
Plunge Protection Team, was originally the headline for an article in The Washington Post by staff writer Brett D. Fromson, published on Sunday, February 23, 1997. It is commonly believed that he did not invent the term; that it was added later by a copy desk editor as a sensational nickname for the subject of the article, the President's Working Group on Financial Markets in the United States. It includes the Secretary of the Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Founded in 1988 after the 1987 stock market crash, it theoretically ensures the stability of the financial markets, prevents liquidity problems, and ensures that stock market hiccups do not cause bank runs. Some Wall Street bears believe that it buys stock index futures or uses other methods to help keep the American stock markets afloat.
Upon that suspicion, Plunge Protection Team or PPT for short, has become a catch phrase among those who warn about the danger of monetary inflation being used as a tool to more or less directly support stock market prices.
The term, Plunge Protection Team, has also been used to include high ranking private bank officials. Private bank risks have increased with growth in the use of derivatives. Trying to prevent a sudden drop in stock prices might be a way to alleviate some of those risks without cutting back on the derivative contract sales that certain banks make a large percentage of income from. So they, especially those banks associated with the Counterparty Risk Management Policy Group of 1999 and the more recent CRMPG II, have also been suspected of conspiring as part of a broader PPT.
2007-07-17 01:40:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Trevor S 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
See what you get for solutions. I guess no longer one has ever been interior the protection rigidity, or possibly even voted. first of all, we are no longer a democracy. we are a representative Republic. your question is a valid one and maximum suitable on the right song. a sort of days the balloting machines in Florida would be precise and that they are going to surely enable maximum blacks vote. Jeb Bush and George Bush would be long previous after the presidential election. We, or maximum individuals, don't think our management, it somewhat is why maximum would be long previous this election. all of us understand Bush Lied, and lied and lied. My question to you Englander (you had 7 of your protection rigidity killed in Iraq this month), how are you able to enable your government to stay with George Bush and function your guy or woman killed in Iraq? And to the single with each and all the WMD's. Even Bush admitted none have been got here across. you could quote each and all the blogs you choose. in factor of fact that no WMD's have been modern-day in Iraq different than for a million 155mm shell which had some gasoline in in, however no longer deadly, and became a minimum of older than the Kuwaitt conflict. that's okay to have an opinion, yet a minimum of base it on fact. Are you calling your president a liar? "WASHINGTON, Oct 8: US President George Bush has recognised that pre-conflict intelligence claiming Iraq had weapons of mass destruction became "incorrect", yet pronounced his determination to invade Iraq became maximum suitable. "Iraq did no longer have the weapons that our intelligence believed have been there," he advised journalists on the White abode on Thursday night. "The accrued physique of 12 years of our intelligence and that of our allies became incorrect." The blunt acknowledgment got here at some point after US weapons inspector Charles A. Duelfer issued a a million,500-website record on the absence of weapons of mass destruction which Mr Bush had used as a important justification for conflict."
2016-12-10 14:38:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by seeley 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, if the Bush elections were rigged, why didn't he let the Republicans win in 2006?
2007-07-17 01:40:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
In one breath, you libs claim Bush is stupid. In the next breath, you claim that he is smart enough to rig a Presidential Election, Rig the stock market, Set oil prices, Create a terrorist attack on our own shores, etc.etc.etc. Well, which is it????
2007-07-17 01:41:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
2
2017-02-17 18:27:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Judy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2017-02-14 18:55:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmm, do you assume everything you don't do well in is rigged?
.
2007-07-17 01:48:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
your question is rigged too
2007-07-17 01:45:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by seawolf 5
·
2⤊
0⤋