English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i think armageddon would be much better.....deep impact was horrible....in armageddon they focused more on the asteroid and what they focused in deep impact was to put those people in that tunnel...armageddon's story and action is better in my opinion

2007-07-16 23:34:27 · 7 answers · asked by LFC REDS 3 in Entertainment & Music Movies

7 answers

Armageddon is of course much much better, no doubt about. It has more action and more emotional. Armageddon shows that the whole world was affected by the asteroid that made it more dramatic. Deep Impact just mostly show that the US is affected and has a cheesy soap opera kind of drama Armageddon also has the better casts like Bruce Willis, Liv Tyler and Ben Affleck.

2007-07-16 23:56:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Armageddon for definite. It's got humor, action and bits where you just have to cry! Plus the song for that film is I Don't Want To Miss A Thing by Aerosmith which is one of my all time favourite songs.

2007-07-17 06:40:37 · answer #2 · answered by negative_creep 3 · 2 0

Armageddon has Liv Tyler and guarantee some good laugh (providing you turn off the brain).

2007-07-17 06:46:08 · answer #3 · answered by Digital Angel 2 · 0 0

Deep Impact

2007-07-17 06:37:38 · answer #4 · answered by Scorpius59 7 · 0 3

Neither was great, but Deep Impact beats Armageddon.

2007-07-17 06:41:21 · answer #5 · answered by Honesty is the Best Policy 2 · 0 3

i like Armageddon, expecially when one of the crew sacrified himself to save the world, i like the soundtrack too.

2007-07-17 06:38:08 · answer #6 · answered by moonrider 6 · 1 0

both good movies . about the same. try day after tomorrow. same theme.

2007-07-17 06:38:00 · answer #7 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers