When she was on the committee that dismantled the intelligence agencies before 9/11. Before you libs start whining like a bunch of mindless, robotic, lemmings -look it up.
2007-07-16 17:40:07 · 13 answers · asked by Libsuc 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
O Ye truth seeker (your version I suppose) What Bush did before 9/11 was serve as Governor of Texas while you buddy clintonsky permitted the chinese to steal every secret guidance system and submarine operating system the US had. With regard to 9/11, seems like Bush can't win because he attacks an ever looming worldwide muslim threat but didn't do enough the first 200 days in office. Beside getting bj's, letting business run amuck (ENRON, TYCO,etc, etc,), allow global warming to continue un abated, ignore the crisis in Africa, sit by and watch the dot.com crash without a whimper, what did your hero do for the 2,900 days he disgraced us. Go on, blow smoke up the orifices of the uninformed about the economy and how clintonsky was responsible for it.
2007-07-16 18:05:51 · update #1
I'm sure she justified it as she probably still is. She belongs to the blame America first club rather then find a solution to keep it safe.
2007-07-16 17:45:27 · answer #1 · answered by Moose 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
She sure did know what she was doing, and yes she was on that committee, but Libs do not want to hear about that. Even Pelosi, knew what her part in the committee was to be. Another reason why Dems/Libs went to war to battle the Pathway to 911 movie.
The left’s all out assault on P2911 is that they are planning to launch a full scale PR war against ABC and Disney for deciding to air the film. The starting date? September 12th. My first thought was: why not go ahead and start it on the 11th? Afraid you’ll look ‘insenstive’, far lefties? Don’t bother with the worrying. You already look like insensitive, whiny, stupid jerks who don’t care about the First Amendment right here at the anniversary of the attack that was the catalyst on launching a full-scale war on terror, a war that strives to not only root out the bad guys but also to advance the concept of democracy and a free society, something the far left has proven these last few days they don’t give a damn about, simply because they’re beside themselves with fury because a docudrama about 9-11 apparently paints their boy wonder Bubba and the rest of his adminstration in a bad light. Clinton’s bogus legacy must be preseved at any cost. This is very similar too the far left wanting the US to surrender in Iraq and come home, so the President can suffer a big defeat. America losing face in the world over a surrender means nothing to them, and the far left thinks it’s worth America losing face if it means Bush goes down. Priorities, you know.
Something else about all the hoopla and drama surrounding P2911 that I don’t think has gotten much of a mention is this: the left has never shown any outrage over the fact that Clinton indeed did have opportunities to get OBL, but didn’t take them , they’re just upset that those missed opportunities are being preserved for the record on film. Clinton himself admitted that his admin had at least one opportunity to get Binnie but didn’t take it. The left, again, doesn’t care about that. They just care that his incompetency is going to be portrayed for what it is on television for millions of Americans to see. Talk about warped priorities.
A big part of this campaign has not just been to have the movie revised and/or pulled, but to create such a wave of outcry , as to make those who will be watching the movie have doubts as to whether or not Clinton did indeed let OBL get away. The spin about this docudrama being written by a ‘right winger’ should be muted by the fact that the executive producer is a Clinton (and other Democrats) supporter, but Howard Dean and the other far left haven’t mentioned that part of the behind the scenes equation. Then again, the far left have never let the facts stand in the way of a good ol’ fashioned rant, have they?
Clinton's and Nancy P, can not have such a thing, to be viewed by American citizens.
And guess what? The left’s campaign to destroy this movie in its original form is apparently working. Better get you a copy now, or never will be able too.
2007-07-16 18:09:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Former Democrat Sen. Torricelli did it in the Senate with the help of Shummer. It was called the "Torricelli Doctrine". It made it against Federal Law for the CIA and the FBI to exchange information. It also forbade the CIA from cultivating informants unless they were choirboys. It decimated our intelligence gathering capabilities. Bush and the Republicans and some Democrats repealed the law. Torricelli was drummed out of the Senate for taking bribes
2007-07-16 17:54:53 · answer #3 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
knew what she was doing UMMM... I don't think she or any other extreme lefty knows what the right thing to do in the real world is. Congress at a 18% approval rating....that's lower than Bush. now that's bad.
2007-07-16 17:47:19 · answer #4 · answered by Working Stiff 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Those LIb Dems do everything deliberately! They are hellbent on destroying America!
2007-07-17 17:36:26 · answer #5 · answered by brenda r 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Commissar Pelosi... Sure she knew what she was doing. She has never done anything in government that wasn't tied to her socialist agenda.
2007-07-17 01:43:11 · answer #6 · answered by Iceman 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Nancy Pelosi is a big Lib from San Fransick-o. 'Nuff said.
2007-07-16 17:44:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Pelosi needs to keep her fat nose out of things. T
2007-07-16 18:30:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the calculating wench knew exactly what she was doing as her agenda is to destroy our way of life
2007-07-16 20:55:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Doubt it.
But really, when has she ever had any measly clue as to what she's doing?
2007-07-16 17:44:43 · answer #10 · answered by Emma 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋