English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-16 17:28:47 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

arms seems to have taken an early lead

2007-07-16 17:32:42 · update #1

19 answers

I'd probably say legs, just 'cause if I had more arms then they'd expect me to actually do my job faster at work. Ha. Yeah right.

But having an extra set of legs means that I'd get where I'm going a lot faster, which is a good thing. And that alone would probably make up for me having to shave 4 legs in the shower.

2007-07-16 17:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Arms

2007-07-16 17:31:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Arms

2007-07-16 17:30:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

arms. I'd be able to do more things at the same time. I'd probably trip with another set of legs.

2007-07-17 01:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by ☮♫♥Curious Alice♥♫☮ 6 · 0 0

..

Why have u stopped with arms & legs?

I'd like to have a spare set of what is there where the legs meet. :)

2007-07-16 19:34:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Definitely arms. I think I used them more than my legs so they'd probably be more useful for me.

2007-07-16 17:32:22 · answer #6 · answered by hungryforHoney 2 · 0 0

im an athlete so id rather have a extra pair of legs because ud be able to run three time as fast!

2007-07-16 17:33:54 · answer #7 · answered by Matt Oystersauce 2 · 0 0

arms

2007-07-16 17:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

arms

2007-07-16 17:31:35 · answer #9 · answered by këlly 6 · 0 1

Arms, I'll be able to shank more people in a small amount of time.

2007-07-16 17:31:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers