Harbhajan Singh or Shahid Afridi? Whose the best?
2007-07-16 16:03:50 · 19 answers · asked by Furioso Lion88 5 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Against another?
2007-07-16 16:11:54 · update #1
Afridi, obviously. He is a better than harbajan singh because he beat the hell out of him many a times as well as india...India has no cure for the best afridi. He is a better batsman and a better feilder than the clown in the feild, harbajan.
2007-07-16 21:40:02 · answer #1 · answered by Best Bowler 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Harbhajan Singh and Shahid Afridi are different zone players. On one hand while Bhajji is an expert Bowler, Shahid is an all-rounder. But while comparing, I would say Harbhajan Singh a better one as he is an expert of a segment-Bowling. One can trust him over his bowling capabilities atleast but when it comes for Shahid Afridi, he is neither an expert batsman nor an expert bowler. Its not just aggression which makes a cricketer better, it is his capabilities which finally matters.
Bhajji is 9th highest wicket taker in Test cricket and is still going strong with respectable performances in IPL. He has been one of the permanent member of MI from beginning and has never had a very disappointing season. I have had been a fan of Shahid Afridi because of his terrific hitting skills but he has failed falling in dilemma of either being a bowler or a batsman. He lacked just at the time when he could not decide his priority of being a batsman or a bowler.
2015-06-16 22:31:00 · answer #2 · answered by Felix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you had asked this question, like 2 years back, i would have said Harbajan.
But now, I would say Afridi - as he is an all-rounder.
He is better off Harbajan in all departments - Batting, fielding .
Nowadays, Afridi has become more effective that Harbajan in the bowling department. Harbajan has lost his wicket taking capability, while Afridi tights down the batsman, and also he takes crucial wickets when needed by the team.
Overall - Afridi is a matchwinner - which is far far far most important.
2007-07-16 23:13:26 · answer #3 · answered by Sijus 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is quite unfair to compare Harbhajan Sing and Afridi as one is a bowler whereas other is an allrounder.Comparison should be always between same type of plavers. However, as far as consistency is concerned, Harbhajan Singh is the best.
2007-07-16 17:00:47 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
afridi is the best player than harbhajan singh . afridi now no,3 world best allrounder all over the word .
2014-11-22 10:13:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Afridi is good in batting, bowling & fielding
Also he is a good entertainer
He always challanges his opponent, it's written in his face that he wants to win
therefore Afridi is the best
Harbhajan Singh is good for nothing
2007-07-17 03:35:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bowling-Harbhajan
Batting-Afridi
fielding-afridi
Match winning capability-Afridi
Temperament-Afridi
THERE I GOT TO SAY AFRIDI.
2007-07-16 18:57:59 · answer #7 · answered by vinu 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Harbhajan is good then Afridi and he has the same skill as afridi in batting.. just to make slog on every ball.. harbhajan try to occupy the crease.. if he try to play like afridi he would be better one,.. Bhajji is best
2007-07-16 18:53:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Zaheer,Ishant,H Singh and Irfan are good as well as Akthar,Afridi,Gul,Tanvir.Choosing between the two groups is difficult but I would say that Indian bowling attack has a slight upper hand when compared to pakistani bowlers.
2016-05-19 22:33:28 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In all aspects it's Afridi......I think Harbhajan is not even an ant in front of him.....I still remeber that Test match where Afridi thrashed Harbhajan.....He scored 4 consecutive sixes in four balls.....He rocks!!
2007-07-16 23:40:14 · answer #10 · answered by Goldie 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋