2007-07-16 15:49:58 · 13 answers · asked by Spades 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
I've contemplated the thought for a long time. whether or not I will have children. I know definantly I would adopt because we are all children of the same earth and someone out there could use m love and care when they are lived in not such a good situation. I've always wanted to adopt a girl from asia because asian woman on the market for adoption are almost always forgotten because boys have a higher value there. But yes if love exists thats all that matters. So I keep my hot body for longer than dealing with a pregnancy, haha. I'm sure it would be fine.
2007-07-16 20:16:49 · answer #1 · answered by Ms. Witaker 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well one would hope that if their love was true and real it would overcome that. There is always adoption. If a woman wants to get married just for babies then she has the wrong priorities. Marriage is about love, babies are just another way to express that love. Its not the only way.
Or she could be someone like me who doesn't want kids and would view it as a plus.
2007-07-16 22:53:55 · answer #2 · answered by Lady Geologist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let me get this straight; This theoretical woman should consider getting married to a man she has no reasonable expectation of being in love with as much as the man she is with now. She should then proceed to have children with a man she is not in love with as much with as the other man.
Does this sound like a good idea? I think it is a formula for disaster. I also think most women are so superficial in their thought and selfish, they would go ahead and do this. Probably less than 5% of the women out there would considr what I said.
2007-07-16 23:00:54 · answer #3 · answered by eric l 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if it is true love. A guy had a crush on me, and told me that he could have have children. I was not liking him more than his friendship. Other than computers, and our faith, we had nothing else in common. He later dated a girl who had 3 children from a bitter marriage, which was great, because now he had 3 children.
2007-07-16 22:56:44 · answer #4 · answered by kicking4jc 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally I would think that would be a plus because a lot of people myself included don't posses a overwhelming desire to have children. A lot of women do, however. I think it has something to do with brain chemistry.
Get yourself a cat. They are clean, they bury their own poop, they are much cheaper to raise, and you can put them outside when they bother you.
2007-07-16 23:21:38 · answer #5 · answered by ericbryce2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure there are plenty of women that could be fine with that......but personally, I don't think I could be 100% truly happy without children of my own, so no matter how great this guy would be....I could not see myself being completely happy....I love children sooo much!
2007-07-16 23:00:36 · answer #6 · answered by Skittles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When there is true love, a couple can overcome any obstacles. Plus, there are many other ways to have a baby.
2007-07-16 22:59:15 · answer #7 · answered by mnkbtt10 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if she loved him more then she loved herself, I don't think that not being able to make babies would matter, If she wanted babies , well she could adopt.
2007-07-16 22:57:41 · answer #8 · answered by fuzzykitty 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God yes. Not all women want babies themselves. If you want them, then find someone who wants to adopt maybe.
2007-07-16 22:57:59 · answer #9 · answered by bluedog0610 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Er, am I missing something?
This is Astronomy and Space?
.
2007-07-16 23:01:17 · answer #10 · answered by tsr21 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋