English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-16 14:42:15 · 6 answers · asked by baba b 1 in Health Men's Health

6 answers

A natural penis just plain works better at giving pleasure than a cut one. But a man is more than a penis, so I would try not to hold it against a man I loved if his parents had made a stupid decision and had him cut when he was a baby. Happily I'm married to an intact man and am very grateful to my parents-in-law for not chopping him when he was born. If we have a son, he will stay intact.

2007-07-18 13:20:41 · answer #1 · answered by Maple 7 · 0 0

It really doesn't matter

Ive had both and prefer uncircumcized just because its easier to pleasure and dont need lubes as often. its more to play with, and he's always been clean.

but in the end if a girl makes an issue out of it there's a problem with her not the guy. they both look almost the same when hard anyways from my experience

2007-07-16 15:01:21 · answer #2 · answered by Stacy 3 · 2 0

It's kind of ridiculous to prefer one over the other. As if the guy had any choice in the matter.

If you do have a preference, then you should feel just fine about men objectifying and judging every one of your body parts, unless you want to be a hypocrite.

2007-07-16 23:39:09 · answer #3 · answered by superman11978 3 · 0 0

I prefer uncircumcised

2007-07-16 17:46:02 · answer #4 · answered by MarineWife 3 · 1 0

I prefer circumcisied, I do not know how clean an uncircumcisied man keeps his penis, there can be bacteria lerking his foreskin that he nor I know about..

2007-07-16 14:58:33 · answer #5 · answered by sshhmmee2000 6 · 0 1

I always thought I'd liked circumcized just cause it... looks better I suppose, but my boyfriend isn't circumsized and I like him that way. I suppose it depends. There are ups and downs to both.

2007-07-16 15:29:24 · answer #6 · answered by sahariah 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers