You are forgetting one thing, those hypocrites voted for the war, and since the war wasn't resolved within 30 days, they must challenge the administration's decision to go to war. I don't know why they criticize the administration for something they were in favor of, but they are followers of the lefties in Congress, so anything they say or do goes, right?
They could care less about Hussein or Bin Laden, they more or less support them since they don't support our troops, or the mission.
Great question.
2007-07-16 12:07:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
you do not qualify as all of england. you're ONE individual who occurs to be from Britain. a million. Yeah, we've elected detrimental leaders those days, yet Obama has been a good worse president than Bush became, and that's announcing some thing. 2. it somewhat isn't authentic. initially, we are the international's best paying for and merchandising companion. We commerce and help the economies of international places all around the globe. 3. returned, not authentic. 4. we are between the best and wealthiest countries in the international. which could be shown statistically. 5. Are you kidding? the U. S. did replace into the chief of the Allies and aided the attempt in collaboration with the different Allied powers in defeating Germany, Japan, and so on. 6. What? The subculture that something of the international has observed too. Your welcome. ought to you think of the international without Hollywood? 7. I agree that the U. S. should not be the international's police. 8. We do exactly nice given the crappy situations. better than even the united kingdom suited now. 9. the two the U. S. and the united kingdom have their slang, so be it? 10. American comedy is somewhat liked throughout purely like British comedy. 11. Racists are everywhere, not in straightforward terms the U. S. 12. Freedoms and rights are stressful? tell that to the North Korean electorate. 13. not authentic. i'm specific that's stressful to do proper accessory from the two component. 14. not authentic. the variety of generalization. 15. this is the electoral college device. that's nonetheless being debated. It became initially designed to offer states greater representation. sixteen. I disagree with the eating rules, yet American beer is nice i think of. 19. that would or won't be authentic, however the U. S. contributed a great deal to it, suited? you're on an American internet site suited now. 20. Yeah, Britain has a greater cost OF VIOLENT CRIME 21. Lee Harvey Oswalt 22. the U. S. is preferable a thank you to innovating sparkling technologies for production machines, and so on.
2016-09-30 03:43:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here are the answers to all your questions:
Bin Laden? He wasn't in Iraq, never had ties with Iraq, never had anything to do with Iraq and hated Saddam on top of that. All these facts were well known before the war. Besides, did Bush catch Bin Laden? Your question is phrased as if he was "eliminated from the map".
Hussein? What about him? A weakened backward dictator without any serious attack or defense capabilitites. Didn't have WMDs either. This was also well-known. Besides, there are many other dictators still in power right now. Kim Jong Ill? Mogabe?
War in Iraq will continue, but not until Bush says the opposite, but until brainwashed idiots who support him finally see that this stupid policy is counterproductive and really hurts this country without ANY results to show for it.
You ask why people who KNOW about the subject are not allowed to work. The best answer to this question is: why don't you ask your moron president? Why didn't he listen to experts around the world before the war who warned him againt invasion? Why didn't he listen to his generals who told him that the preparation to the war was inadequate? Why didn't he listen to the results of the recent Iraq study that didn't have "surge" as the best option? Really, WHY?
2007-07-16 12:36:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by AJ 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
How can you stand the silence
That pervades when we all cry?
How can you watch the violence
That erupts before your eyes?
How can you tell us something
Just to keep us hanging on
Something that just don't mean nothing
When we see it you are gone
Clinging to some other rainbow
While we're standing,waiting in the cold
Telling us the same old story
knowing time is growing old.
That was a Wonderful Remark
I had my eyes closed in the dark
I sighed a million sighs
I told a million lies-to myself-to myself
How can we listen to you
When we know your talk is cheap
How can we ever question
Why we give more and you keep
How can your empty laughter
Fill a room like ours with joy.
When you're only playing with us
Like a child does with a toy.
How can we ever feel the freedom
or the flame lit by the spark
How can we ever come out even
When reality is stark.
That was a Wonderful Remark......
George Bush Senior created Saddam Hussein with US TAX DOLLARS.He used Saddam Hussein to fight Iran for fourteen years.Osama Bin Laden was given US TAX DOLLARS to fight the Russians when the Soviets were attacking Afghanistan.Both Wars were wars of proxy.The US won both!Dont forget the lies that were justified to take America and Britain to war."The chickens are coming home to roost."Malcolm X.
2007-07-16 12:44:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by joshua lockjaw smiff 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your last line says it all Bud. Nothing anyone can say will change your mind so I won't even bother to try. Your great Hero, led you into a quagmire in Iraq for all the wrong reasons when those resources could have been used in the hunt for Bin Laden, NATO could have contained Saddam if given the chance but the great Decider decided to do it without UN approval, which in many peoples eyes, makes you the aggressor and not the victim. And in many of those same peoples eyes, that makes the US as bad as the terrorists. Not saying I agree with their logic but it is easy to sit in judgment of others when it is not your homeland that is being bombed and attacked and us North Americans know nothing about that as we have never really been invaded and one major terrorist attack in over 200 years and now they are behind every bush, nuke here, nuke there, attack them there before they come here. And if any nation wants to develop their own nukes, well, that's not fair. Wahhhh! You reap what you sow, we all know that and if war for the sake of war is the new US calling, then you are no better than the terrorists. And as far as letting the military do their work, isn't Petraus the 3rd "best" man for the job that Bush and Co have lauded. There were 2 "great" Generals before him.
2007-07-16 12:21:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bob D 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
One has nothing to do with the other.
If one person commits murder, and another person commits rape, is it wrong to blame the rapist? They're not as bad as the murderer after all, so should they get a free pass?
What Hussein and bin Laden did is not relevant.
Bush violated federal laws and betrayed his oath of office by ignoring constitutional requirements. That alone is reason to blame him for those actions. And given that he has publicly admitted those actions, and given that the Supreme Court has confirmed those violations, it's not a subjective issue.
Bush broke the law. Whether anyone else did bad things is irrelevant to that point.
As far as the occupation of Iraq, yes, it will continue until Bush orders the troops home, or until Congress forces the issue using its Article I powers. Read the Constitution. Bush does not have unlimited unchecked authority in this matter. Anything dealing with allocation of funds, declaration of war (which there has not been, by the way -- we are not at war in any legal sense), and control of the troops is shared between Congress and the Executive branch. Read Article I Section 8.
2007-07-16 12:25:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I stand behind our troops! However, I can't say I stand behind the war...We are loosing thousands of our young men fighting a war that should have never been, We went into Iraq for all the wrong reasons. I do not stand behind Bush because he deceived us as to the reasons he said we were going into Iraq. I believe we needed to remove Hussein but for the right reasons. Iraq has never been a stable country and it won't be after the war either, We just keep loosing troops and for what? Thank God Bush can't run again!
2007-07-16 12:12:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Robin L 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
since vietnam there has been No conventional war we fight! these terror based countries can go on forever and here our bleeding heart libs look to quit, dont get me wrong .. i believe the old saying War is hell, but we are fighting w 1 hand tied behind our backs, the true way to end this quickly is to deploy mini nukes into irans nuke sites and 1-2 on the afghan /paki borders where the al quaida hide,,, doing this the war of terror will collapse within hours,along w minimal deaths to innocents
2007-07-16 12:24:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by alangj91761 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you or Bush could PAY for the war I would NOT say a thing!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are brainwashed into think that the Iraq war is "The War on Terror" and it's NOT. Until people like you wake the
F U C K up and realize that this war started and continues to go on because of NO-BID contracts........Making all of Bush's campaign contributors billions of dollars while sky rocketing the National Debt........putting it on "America's Charge Card"
Who will pay for this war?
When will it be paid off?
Why should MY tax dollars pay for it?
When you can answer these questions please let me know!!!
This goes for Bush's undeserved tax breaks to the top 1% of Americans.........It's a bunch of crap ....Do you believe that that we can give tax breaks and not really pay for them? They don't count then. An 8 year old can realizes this. You can't go around spending money that you know that you can't ever pay back!!!
2007-07-16 12:06:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
"The soldier above all others prays for peace, for it is the soldier who must suffer and bear the deepest wounds and scars of war."
-Douglas MacArthur, General of the Army
2007-07-16 12:08:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5
·
2⤊
0⤋