If an anti-war person supports Hillary as-the-wind-blows Clinton, are they being hypocritical?

Question

Considering she endorsed the Iraq war for three years after voting for it?

Answer 1

In all fairness you must check to see if her fingers were crossed when she voted.
How can you criticize this honest woman who voted against the war before she voted for it ;---after deciding not to vote for it again, unless she decides otherwise.
You really have to be a woman to understand her determination to do one thing or the other.
Can't you give her a lousy 3 more years to make up her mind on this.---You're only confusing her by pressuring her to make these snap decisions.
I believe she's for the war , but against our being involved in it, but she may change her mind about one or the other firm decisions that she might make.---Or maybe not.

Answer 2

No. As a Senator representing New York, a state that was actually attacked on 9/11, she may have felt that standing with the president in his alleged effort to combat terrorism was the right thing to do. She was wrong. I knew she was wrong but she has tried to make amends so I accept that.

Most of the American people have also changed their minds.
I think she’s learned never to trust a neocon again. It’s a lesson we should all take note of.

Answer 3

No, they are not being hypocritical. They are being misled by the Hillary of the Campaign. In real life she is the Iron Maiden, she is cold as ice and completely ruthless. She will take any position to get elected, then begin to show her true colors on 01/21/09, in a very similar pattern to GW Bush. The scary part is that there is no way to tell what she will really do if she actually (unlikely) makes it there.

Answer 4

I'll let the neo-cons answer this one. After all of the recent "family value" Republicans being busted for sex with hookers and men in their cars, they can probably speak about hypocricy better than I can.

Answer 5

But of course.

How does the saying go....

"It's a woman's perogative to change her mind."

Hillary is the very embodiment of that statement.

Answer 6

Not particularly more so than they always are, just by being anti-war, while living in a nation protected by the worlds most expensive military.

Answer 7

and foolish and narrow minded and self defeating and so on and so on...by supporting ms clinton you are inviting another white house eight years of...

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

Answer 8

No they make a lot of sense, like someone who is agianst global warming, but flies a jet around everyday.

Answer 9

That's what people refuse to see. They think things will be 'different'.

So many who are supporting her are anti-war, anti-large corporate monopolies, etc. And here she is, deep as anyone can get. LOL

Answer 10

Hillary has them dazzled by the Clinton name. That's why she dropped off her maiden name.