How many supported the war in the beginning.?

Question

I did. I will admit that i wanted to see Saddam Hussein removed from power and to find all of the chemical weapons he still had. My question on the latter part of what i just previously wrote is this. If they didn't find the rest, then who has them?

I was of the same opinion of the matter of getting in and getting the hell out as well. FAAAAST!!!! It would have helped most certainly if they would have stuck to the original game plan. That's what pisses me off about the mess. Goddamn them(and me too.)

usa p: That's obvious. I remember when Saddam sent many of his fighters in 1991 to locations in Iran as well. I wonder if they ever tried denying that fact?

I have nothing against Iran.

Answer 1

WOW

Reading your answers it seems everyone missed the whole point - havent you guys figured out yet that regardless o fwhat the heck was in Iraq we were going to war anyway - the report of WMD's was simply a ruse

It was used to play the american general public - you know - all that sucker born every minute stuff - this was simply bush finishing his daddys plan and setting the stage for attempting to legitimize the UN as a world governing body - cant you all see this uey??

Every single on eof you shoudl have been against the war from the begining - who the helll every heard of America starting a war - it has always been us waiting to get attacked - or allowing an attack to come in first before we went out - we had never attempted a preemptive war until bush got into office

Doesnt that throw any warning bells off in your heads??

Now with his ability to declare matial law, national emergencies and wage war without a congressional declaration - are you not worried what he will do next

you should be

Answer 2

NOT me. NEVER. When all the news stations say the same thing its red flashing warning danger danger we are being lied to. No one said wait a minute show proof or are there alternate explainations for the aluminum tubes. I think Saddam was a damn good dictator. We have supported puppets and dictators for a very very long time dont pretend that we somehow got a guilty feeling and tried to do the right thing. I feel bad that he ran afowl of Exxon and this administration. Its obvious Bush Sr could have done this a long time ago. He had already gassed the kurds when Iraq 1 went down. Bush Sr and Saddam got along great and nobody got deposed.

Answer 3

The chemical weapons and remants of the alledged bio- weapons program Saddam had were destroyed in th first gulf war and by the ten years of sanctions and inspections that followed it.

I followed the inspections and IAEA reports from the begining and I knew Bush's assertions were specious from day one.

This war had nothing whatsoever to do with weapons or a threat to the US and Bush knew that too.

They wanted oil and a permanent base to control a volitile region. Pro or Anti-Zionist it doesn't matter, the neo-cons (all zionists by the way) wanted to enforce peace in Israel by force. They convinced Bush it would work.

Wrong, you can't enforce peace at the the point of a gun. That antithetical and silly to it's core.

The CIA knew Saddam was no threat to us and that there was no al-queda there. They said so. The news just didn't report it.

Answer 4

I'll tell you who has them; Iran has the weapons. And the Democrat Politicians know this, that's why the Democrats are having a fit. I'll tell you how they were handed over to Iran, by Saddam. On Feb.17,1998 Bill Clinton says to Saddam "Saddam either you dispose of the weapons, or America will take necessary action,if you reject peace then we have to use force." As the leader in Iran told Saddam, It's time to put are differences aside." When the WTC was attacked in FEB.1993, bin Laden calls Clinton a weak coward for not fighting back after the attack on Feb.1993. Clinton had a chance to get bin Laden but refuses. The CIA and FBI warned Clinton of a major attack that was going to take place here in America, but Clinton again ignores what he was told. (Democrat Politicians know Iran has these weapons that Saddam handed over to Iran after Bill Clinton threaten Saddam we were going to take action.) This is the reason the Democrat Politicians are worried!.......When you supported the war in the beginning you should keep suppoting the war and our soldiers!!!

Answer 5

I didn't. He didn't have any real chemical weapons any more and the proof is right before our eyes. The US can't find them because they weren't there. War was unnecessary because economic sanctions had crippled his regime so badly that they simply could afford to maintain chemical weapons any more. He refused to let inspectors in because he was insane and arrogant. He wanted people to fear him and his chemical weapons even though he no longer had any.

Answer 6

Not Then, Not Now, Not Ever. You never under any condition break a Constitution that our Fore Fathers put forth as the Framers. They are never, never to be broken, George Bush broke the 2ND Constitution. He is a double eared idiot for doing that and Legacy is shot, he don't have one.

Answer 7

I would not have a problem with the war if Bush would have done what needed to be done and got out of there, but all this liberation is a bunch of crap.

Answer 8

I supported the Afghanistan war, because there were people in Afghanistan that were guilty of helping to attack my country.
I never supported the invasion of Iraq.

Answer 9

Sorry Joe I didn't. I knew it was a trumped up war, just like I knew 9/11 was a fraud. I applaud you for coming out and being truthful though.

Answer 10

i supported bush but i dint like the idea of the war