Why don't republicans want justice for the victims of 9/11?

Question

Find Bin Laden.

keeping him alive is much better than bringing him to justice. Got it. I want to know WHY you don't care about giving the victims of 9/11 justice. WHY?

So many of you cannot answer this question, yet seek to find the answer by asking diversionary questions of unrelated people. Let me get everyone back on track. Why don't you care about justice for the victims of 9/11?

I don;t belong to a party, but I am smary enough to know that Bush disbanded the search for Bin Laden. That is why I called him out, and not the guy who unsuccessfully ran agaianst him 3 years ago, or anyone else. No answers, just a bunch of blind patriotism. REALLY sad

butterbar, don't waste my time then. Either answer or move along. I suspect that was an attempt to hide the fact that you have no real answer. But it reveals the fact that you also have no questions of your leadership. Don't put yourself on a pedestal above the other users here...it is a short fall down.

Sorry, justice to me does NOT mean killing ANYONE, it means holding them accountable with our nation's jusducial system, and locking him up from ever being able to do another 9/11. I can't believe how many of you don't believe in the american way anymore. Bin laden has won. Nice job.

Answer 1

To "made in the u.s.a."--- I'm ever so sorry chap, but this is ONE thing you will NEVER be able to pin on "liberals."

We're not the ones who spent almost a trillion dollars (so far!) on Al Queda. bush and YOU GUYS are.
And they sure do appreciate it, too!

They also appreciate the 500,000 TONS OF EXPLOSIVES which "disappeared" in the first few months of the war. BECAUSE THE MUNITIONS PILE WASN'T SECURED.

Howz that feel?

Answer 2

it would not be Bush? and that i believe it incredibly is going to in no way be McCain the two! McCain replaced into an Air tension pilot who spent his days in a penal complex camp. He wasn't a grunt in the Jungles of Vietnam the place they did no longer take prisoners. His modern-day stance, no save in mind that we've been incorrect, and no remember what the human beings think of, desires to proceed throwing money at company welfare! The Iraqi president. Molokai, broke off talks this week with the U. S. as he says "WE" fail to correctly known their u . s . a . as a sovereign u . s . a .. if it is so, why are we there? If and whilst we bypass away, Iraq will align with Iran, no longer with the U. S.! plenty for bringing peace to the middle East!

Answer 3

it would appear finding big bin has turned into a sticky wickett involving the stability of pakistan. we, (the u.s. of a.), cannot go in there without causing real problemos for the pakistanian government.

maybe if we hadnt gone into iraq, we could afford to really go after him and support pakistan. but right now it's just not doable. heck pakistan doesnt even want to go after him because of the backlash they would get from the extremists. you have to remember pakistan has some serious fully armed nukes with a decent delivery system. yikes!

well ok, if you are talking eye for eye justice for the vicims of the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks, we have straight up hunted down and killed many of those responsible as well as other extremists who particiapted indirectly. while we havent killed big bin YET, we have extracted some measure of good old, old-testament revenge. AND the very nature of your question suggests our revenge must be the blood of the terrorits. correct?

the serpant al quada has many heads and is constanty evolving. we must keep chopping at those heads. especially since every pound of flesh we take for the revnge you say is the only appropriate answer creates other serpants equally evil.

well all i can go on is what your question asked. i just told you in no uncertain words why we havent killed ol' boy yet. when you are finished fuming at whatever smoke and mirrors you belive in, give us the "real" answer please...i need a good giggle!

Answer 4

If it were up to Liberals right now, we wouldn't be in any other country but our own. So which does more injustice to families of 9/11: Attempting to find anyone connected with the terrorist attacks or promotes terrorism towards the United States, or bring out troops home?

Answer 5

You cannot bring the victims back, to get rid of Bin Laden just opens the door for a new "Bin Laden" or worse.
Vigilence on our own soil s our best defense. There are always going to be terrorists.......

Answer 6

Wow! You are tricky. The way you worded your question we must assume only Republicans are to blame for not finding Bin Laden. You got me.

Answer 7

9/11? According to most libs, 9/11 never happened. It's all made up by Bush.

Answer 8

I could talk about logistics as a limiting factor, but that would go over the heads of most of the foam-fleck ranting leftists on here.

Answer 9

I call it "head in the sand" disease. If Repukelicans saw the truth, then they'd know that Democraps have been working with them for many years now. Bin laden, unfortunately, had nothing to do with 9.11.01. Google the "first" Bin Laden video (with the fat actor, who is right handed..lmao) and then research the first speech Bin Laden gave after the attack. He disavow's knowledge and even suggests that those who attacked America are in its government. Stop believing the propaganda. No Arabs hijacked anything, especially NOT on the one day that NORAD, FAA and every single failsafe in place happen to fail? If you believe that, then I got a bridge to sell you: it connects Manhattan and Brooklyn.

Answer 10

why? it's much better to have him marginalized and hiding in a cave like a scared goat and go about the business of killing and crushing the jihaddist infrastructure worldwide