they had so much fun on Yahoo answers they left the Kids to starve? I think it is KooKoo Bananas and his Wife IM-Foxygirl
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070716/ap_on_re_us/neglect_internet_addiction
2007-07-16 06:00:43 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
These two are victims.
They will claim some medical addiction to video games.
An employed cashier? I think that says EVERYTHING anyone needs to know about this guy!!
2007-07-16 06:28:30 · answer #1 · answered by Supercell 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Never legislate for all because of the actions of the idiotic. I have spent a lot of time on the Internet yet I know if my kid's hungry or needs to be taken care of that I take care of them. If these idiots in the story didn't have the Internet and video games, they would have found something else to be neglectful with.
If we keep trying to legislate things toward the slower people in society because "Johnny's an idiot and can't handle it" and pretty soon we'll have to outlaw anything sharper than a spork to eat with.
2007-07-16 13:09:58 · answer #2 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually I think it is children who should have limited access to the internet. So go take a nap. And it was video games that did it. I read it yesterday. To be exact Dungeon/Dragons.
2007-07-16 13:05:11 · answer #3 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are ACTUALLY claiming they were addicted. THAT is there defense. And I believe some atty actually attempted to add it as an addiction to the medical books. They are NOT going to do that without more review, but seriously? NOBODY made them decide to not work, spend all of their inheritance on games, OR Have children.
2007-07-16 13:19:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sounds like conservatives are losing the war on common sense.
2007-07-16 13:09:07 · answer #5 · answered by Darth Vader 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is going to sound insensitive but... do we really want these kinda people to reproduce and further dilute the gene pool?... some times I wish you had to take a qualifiying exam before you are allowed to have children...
2007-07-16 13:04:44 · answer #6 · answered by Ryan F 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
That's what we need more laws. Rather I can think of some I'd like to repeal.
2007-07-16 13:05:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey, McMurphy....talk about "legislate morality."
Can you say,"abstinence?"
sheesh
2007-07-16 16:26:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Remember folks, this question is from the same guy that got all the conservative confomists to agree that health care for those who need it but cant afford it or lost it is "bad".
Just remember that.
2007-07-16 13:04:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Those people need to have their kids taken away.
2007-07-16 13:04:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋