English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All concerned:

It seems as time goes by certain things are accepted in society that once were not. I have nothing against homosexuals just their choice of lifestyle but as long as they do not infringe upon my rights and freedom I am okay. What I find insulting is the constant excuses by this community. Often they compare their struggle like that of African Americans. Obviously a difference. First I was born of African Persuasion - and this resulted from my parents and this countries afixiation on categorizing the phenotypes of people - Second, homosexuals made a choice - it seems as though many parents are making excuses and not making a solution - when kids talk about them feeling as though they are gay. Just because a person feels "gay" doesn't mean this perversion is right. My question is when will homosexuals realize that you can't force people to go back on good morales and ethics?

2007-07-16 04:59:53 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

17 answers

Why would homosexuality "infringe upon" your "rights and freedom"?

2007-07-16 09:58:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Homosexuality was once widely accepted in society. I think it's genetic and what I find insulting are those people who think their religious beliefs on the subject should be forced on everyone else. Ironically the same group has no problem with remarried divorcees within their own "faith" violating what the bible has to say about that. The same groups also oppose embryonic stem-cell research even though their own members get invitro fertilization when their "god" gives them a barren womb; the heck with everyone else. The same bible demonstrates no respect for men, women or children (born or unborn) and lists personhood as a journey that requires four steps 1) conception 2) a womb 3) blood and 4) breath. -- Good morals and ethics? Remove the plank from thine own eye as your mythical friend tells you to in the "book"; the book, by unknown authors, which I know you're using as the basis for your beliefs. And btw, I'm a heterosexual person and I don't consider homosexuality a threat to my marriage at all. Now if some good-looking floozy, about 20 yrs younger than me, decided she wanted my husband and began a hot pursuit of him then I might feel threatened.

2007-07-16 10:23:24 · answer #2 · answered by s c 1 · 0 0

I see your point. I myself am bisexual. I am not here to chew your head off dont worry. I did choose to be bi. Of course it wasnt for the threesomes. I choose to be bi for the sake that i feel love should have no gender boundaries. I can love a woman just the same as i can love a man. Difference will only show up when the relationship will reach an intimate level.
I have to disagree on one thing. Not all homosexual choose to be gay. A lot are born gay. Cross my heart i have been friends with 2 such males. As children they show more signs of female hormones. "real" gays dont want to push their lifstyle down anyones throat. They sure as hell dont want to stick out like a sore thumb either by wearing hot pink and baby blue pants. Acceptance is a big issue. Trying to live a close to near normal life is all a true homosexual wants.
society is more accepting to the idea to homosexuality. So there shouldnt be a problem. The suffering of homosexuals is nothing compared to that of african americans. Whatever homosexual stated that should be slapped.
Another thing, straight people tend to try and speak for homosexuals. They try too hard to give them equality when their really just making them look bad.
just my opinion.

2007-07-16 05:13:33 · answer #3 · answered by Haruhi 4 · 2 1

"Second, homosexuals made a choice " I wasn't aware that I did. I am SOOOO glad you know so much about me!
"My question is when will homosexuals realize that you can't force people to go back on good morals and ethics?"
-I didn't realize that your morals were any better than mine. Your whole question is offensive and wrong. I can't believe that it is now 2007 and there are still people as dumb as you.

2007-07-16 05:12:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

homicide is with out consent. It skill taking someones existence against their will, which contravenes their human suitable to existence and their unfastened will, which isn't in basic terms a cultural widespread, it incredibly is a human suitable that applies globally (regardless of if it incredibly is enforced or breached is yet another factor.) Homosexuality is with consent. It comprises the monogamous, common and committed love of two human beings of the comparable intercourse. Neither social gathering are doing something with out the different's consent, and the two are answering one yet another's desires with out unfavourable effect on everyone else. it incredibly is in basic terms like a guy and a woman falling in love, it incredibly is precisely the comparable theory with different genders. For something to boost into morally - no longer in basic terms culturally - unacceptable, we'd frequently anticipate it to contain harm of yet another person, a breach of their human rights, or an intentfully malicious act in the direction of somebody else. Homosexuality would not fall under those categories for the comparable reason heterosexuality would not. So, now i've got blown your straw guy out of the water, am i able to have a cookie?

2016-10-21 11:43:34 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Who can really say? I believe that it is right. I have an older 1/2 sibling who is gay as well. Same mother different fathers. I believe that Homosexuallity is right because it doesn't matter if the parents are the same with all siblings, I believe and have always felt that it is the "gene" factor in all of us that matters.

2007-07-17 03:38:00 · answer #6 · answered by Kerbow 1 · 0 0

"Second, homosexuals made a choice"

Right there you need to go do some research. Second thinkin about letting people live their lives. What gives you or anyone the right to tell someone who they should love or how they should live? You want them to not infringe upon your rights, well dont infringe upon theirs.

I smell BBQ.

2007-07-16 05:07:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

(groan)
Why do you care, and why tell us? Organized murder(AKA War) for religious principles is "morally right" but someithing as personal as who we choose to love is everybody's business?

It's not a choice, any more than being left-handed is a choice. Left-handedness was(probably still is, somewhere) considered a sign of Satanic Possession.

That was crap, and so is this; next.

2007-07-16 05:18:41 · answer #8 · answered by Divadarya: trans n' proud 3 · 1 0

It is good morals and ethics to treat people with respect and compassion. What happens in the bedroom between consenting adults is none of your business. You'd do better to try to become a better person yourself, than condemn others whom you do not understand.

2007-07-16 05:08:35 · answer #9 · answered by KC 7 · 4 0

Freedom of choice!

2007-07-16 05:03:42 · answer #10 · answered by livin the dream 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers