Because that's not her title. "Majesty" is considered higher than "royal" and thus having both would be redundant.
2007-07-16 16:48:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by JerH1 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Have you ever heard anyone referred to as Your/his or her Majesty without being Royal. (self important colleagues apart)?
2007-07-16 07:43:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scouse 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Referred, although some people do revere her as well.
2007-07-16 04:44:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Queen is only refered to as 'her royal majesty' during state functions/opening of parliment etc.
Although it is one of her official titles.
Hope that helped dude.
2007-07-16 03:56:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by russ.mcdonnell 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
I'm not at all sure, maybe the use of the word her Majesty make the word "Royal" redundant, possibly ? I think shes just a fat old thing that is leading to the decay of a once powerful Nation, which is in dire need of Strong Male Leadership once again !
2007-07-16 03:56:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
6⤋
She is - why dont you do some research before asking all these questions about the Queen.
2007-07-16 03:51:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by elaeblue 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Because it is not part of her title, nor is it the correct mode of address.
2007-07-16 05:13:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mike 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Either way. Why does it matter to you ?
2007-07-16 03:56:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
are u sure she isnt? i thought she was
2007-07-16 07:50:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋