Nope, no difference except appearance.
MM
2007-07-16 03:29:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by magicman116 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whichever one is toughest, which is usually, but not always, the biggest individual. But don't try this at home. Red, tiger, and albino Oscars (and the original brown Oscar) are all color variants of the same species, Astronotus ocellatus. All the Oscar varieties have the potential to reach the same adult size.
2016-05-19 01:06:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is no difference out side of color.
Oscar is a oscar. They are the same species.
True albino oscars are rare, the common form of "albinos" are just white oscars.
2007-07-16 04:54:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Coral Reef Forum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes there is. albino is less aggressive than red tiger oscar but still aggressive enough thou. other than that it boils down to the individual fish personality. oscar is the fish with the most personality and i believe each of them has a unique character. mine will act dead when i change water but will play a ping pong ball when i throw it into the water. cheeros!
2007-07-16 05:24:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. The closer to nature..the animal is..the healthier. Albino in anything is a genetic defect. Other than that?...No difference.
2007-07-16 03:46:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by carolannableu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no difference - just the appearance. Here's a link that explains more about the oscar.
http://www.fishchannel.com/fish-species/freshwater-profiles/oscar-2.aspx
2007-07-16 07:26:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by PetLover 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Albinos carry no black pigments in their body, thus they support red eyes. Except for this characteristics, there are no other difference between them.
2007-07-16 04:02:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by aquamac 4
·
0⤊
0⤋