Who're the 2 people lobbyists should try to influence most, who have the power to get things done in Congress?

Question

A lobbyist really needs to get a bill passed quickly. Who are the two people he should try to influence most, who have the power to get things done in Congress?

a. the president pro tempore of the Senate and the vice president of the United States
b. the speaker of the House and the vice president of the U.S.
c. the majority leader of the Senate and the speaker of the House
d. the president pro tempore and the majority leader of the Senate


I would be extremely grateful if you could explain

Answer 1

e. none of the above. while the speaker has considerable power in the house she doesn't have absolute. while all that's needed in the house is a simple majority, some congressmen have so much power in their own right, they can afford to ignore the wish of the speaker even if she is the leader of there own party.
when it comes to the senate while the majority leader can set the agenda he still can't legislation passed as easily. legislation can be held up in the senate by failing to declare a quorum or by filibuster. quorum takes sixty votes to overcome a filibuster two thirds of the senate to stop it. because of this anyone senator can hold up a piece of legislation.
these are why a lobbyist usually tries to influence several legislators to get their bill pass. the two most important would be the chairman of the respective houses on an issue that would effect the lobbyist clients. because committees do most of the heavy lifting when it comes to writing a bill, they can usually get the bill passed, however it is not a guarantee.

Answer 2

c. While their powers are far from absolute they have the most power both to set the agenda of their respective houses of congress and get that agenda carried out. In each of the other 3 choices one or both the named officials is purely a presiding officer with very limited real power.

Answer 3

Well you are not able to precisely say liberalism and social methods paintings both -- take a seem at a bankrupt California. You make a few legitimate aspects nonetheless as in the whole lot, there demands to be stability. Bush did not drive ponzi schemes and ruthless bankers to supply out loans. There is tons blame to head round on the WH as a result of the corrupt elected officers (Repub and Dems) -- we must eliminate them.