Because if they admit Iraq is wrong then may be forced to admit that Bush was wrong on other things as well (ie domestic agenda) it's like a house of cards
2007-07-16 00:47:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There will always be people incredible loyal to their party, be it Republican or Democrat. Even with approval ratings having plummeted for Bush, still 50 - 60% of registered Republicans give the Bush administration positive responses in polls. Bush has been President in an unusual time for America becasuse of the attacks on 9/11, but, only an uninformed person could think, now, the invasion of Iraq was justified, and, a solid strategy, as, there were no weapons of mass destruction, and, Hussein essentially had utterly no contact with the terrorist groups considered our foes. Remember though, Democrats, as informed as the Republicans, voted for the war too. It was a failure of government, all around.
2007-07-16 00:57:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
They do realize, but President Bush's time is not over, and he's got the divine right of positive/negative veto, and when a war is on fire is swifter than slow parlamentarism spittle, and there are some interests behind that we must never forget: armamentism industry and technology.
We're living in a kibernetics world that acts politically in an analogic way. And it's thrilling to realize that while we write about it more than a life is stupidly lost. It's not strategy, it's tactics; and mostly how to stop Weapon Tycoons that don't care: business is business, and if you're a soldier you must know the risks, and Islam is evil like CCCP used to be in Mc Carthy's age. Try to stop this speech, and be welcome to Uthopia.
2007-07-16 01:08:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rafael Maria Castellano 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, most conservative Republicans DO believe that our liberal Republican President listened to Rumsfeld's minimalist war strategy for far too long. If Bush really didn't want Iraq to become his Vietnam, he would have used the 500,000 troops his father had over there and kicked the holy you-know-what out of the rag heads that hate the world, mom, basesall, and apple pie on the 4th of July!
2007-07-16 00:55:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is the responsibility of the President and the military to wage war. Congressmen are overstepping their bounds when they try to manage a war by a committee of 535 people. It cannot be done.
Do you have a strategy that will work? If so, post it and email it to the President. If not, you are just engaging in the same political back stabbing that the Democrats have been doing for six years.
So far, everyone demanding change is not qualified and has not suggested any alternatives that are viable.
2007-07-16 00:48:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
The only thing wrong with current policy is that too many terrorists are still breathing. Of course with the Reaper going into action, that is about to change. This is good for the good guys, bad for the terrorists and bad for the cowardly Neo-Socialist Progessive Liberals.
2007-07-16 00:49:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Zee HatMan 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You're asking people who blelieve the world is only about 6000 years old despite mountains of evidence to the contrary to act rationally. what are the odds of that happening?
2007-07-16 00:46:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by crushinator01 5
·
2⤊
2⤋