Barricade is really Onslaught (Combaticon)
Blackout is really Blastoff (Combaticon)
Devastator is really Brawl (Combaticon) and
Bonecrusher is really a constructicon which forms Devastator?
2007-07-15 22:03:04 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
pretty much. most of the 'formers in the movie weren't even gen 1 'formers. most of them didnt come along till much later or were just invented. and they got a lot of the car types wrong. jazz wasnt a solstice, megatron wansnt a spaceship, bumblebee wasnt a camaro, frenzy wasn't whatever he was, ironhide wasnt a "topkick", and devastator was a combination of 5 other decepticons that formed one super robot. he wasnt the tank thing he was in the film. hopefully in the next one they will get these mistakes corrected. though i did love the film and thought barricade and blackout both looked awesome despite the mistaken vehicle types. prime looked awesome too. NOTE: "formers originally written to appear in the film, optimus prime, bumblebee, ironhide, jazz, prowl, ratchet, wheeljack, megatron, starscream, soundwave, ravage, laserbeak, rumble, skywarp, shockwave. obviously that didnt happen. bummer.
2007-07-15 22:33:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They would've made Bumblee a VW Beetle like in the original toon except Lindsay Lohan beat them to the box office with the Love Bug a few summers ago : P
2007-07-16 03:53:34 · answer #2 · answered by Shienaran 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simple... Transformers would win hands down. Gundams are piloted by humans and humans do get tired.
2016-05-19 00:04:39 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They were created for the movie but their names allude to existing Transformers.
2007-07-15 22:34:11 · answer #4 · answered by Herman 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
errr.....what ???
2007-07-15 22:19:37 · answer #5 · answered by SAL 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋