Since the Democrats keep complaining about the Diebold voting machines being rigged (of which there is absolutely no proof), shouldn't we let them screw things up on their own? Particularly in precincts that have high concentrations of older Democrats.
2007-07-15 19:29:59 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In the Chicago suburbs, punch card ballots were still in use. Since that was primarily a Republican voting bloc, I never heard the Democrats complain and the Republicans (even the elderly ones) seemed able to work a punch card.
2007-07-15 19:43:59 · update #1
I think that's a great idea.
2007-07-15 19:35:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell confident. He became an substantial area of the Clinton Presidency and has greater adventure than any candidate in the race. He additionally has come down from the mountain so which you will possibly communicate after thinking he had gained the Presidency and then having it taken away. So he's waiting. additionally, all areas of the Democratic coalition can help Gore, Conservative, middle and liberal, or maybe many fantastically liberal democrats would get at the back of Gore. He can get the nomination in 2 methods. Win it outright on the Democratic convention with the help of working and gathering delegates or he could be drafted if no person wins the 1st pollat the convention. Gore often is the excellent coalition candidate around. deliver him a digital mail and ask him to run. thank you for the question.
2016-09-30 02:26:41 · answer #2 · answered by cronican 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Gore has business assets now worth about 100 million dollars. He will not run again.
There is that "thing" about Al Gore getting 500,000 more votes in Florida the first time around though - I wonder if you remember that. I also wonder if you realize that about 70% of the country wishes we had a different president now. And, oh yeah... tests did indicate that the software in the electronic voting machines was biased toward the Republicans. I wonder why, considering the business that puts them out is owned by a Republican. BTW: I'm a moderate, but I'm not blind to the obvious. Al Gore won the first election, but the Supreme Court picked our president instead - something that will hopefully never happen again. The Electoral College should die.
2007-07-15 19:35:17 · answer #3 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
What ever the Republicans insist on is what we need to look out for. We had two presidential elections stolen back to back. The first one using caging and the conservative supreme court, because even with all the voter suppression in Florida, Gore was going to carry that state. What does that tell you? The second election was stolen through election fraud via electronic voting and the lack of a paper trail. If Gore ran again, all the people who voted for him in 2000, wouldn't they want to vote for him again? And the folks that actually did vote for Bush, wouldn't a lot of them want to make up for what they might now conclude was a horrible decision and cast their vote for Gore? Draft Gore for 2008.
2007-07-15 20:02:00 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin M 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There should be an independent non-partisan commission, supervised by international observers and contributors, in charge of supervising the whole voting process (including selecting and implementing the most suitable voting devices for any given situation), to make it as impartial and fair as possible. No political parties involved.
2007-07-15 19:40:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No . The butterfly ballots . That created a lot of votes for Pat Buchanan , and for the Communists . Would make it interesting if those ballots were used everywhere . ( fringe parties , not necessarily those particular ones) ;D
2007-07-15 19:37:58 · answer #6 · answered by mikeinportc 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's a thought! Let's try to come up with a voting process which doesn't screw things up either way, and the people who get elected do so without question. Wouldn't that be the ultimate!?
2007-07-15 19:32:03 · answer #7 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Um kinda one side don't you think? I mean, the state at the center of the debate was Florida right? And who's brother is running that state at that time? And didn't Jeb say all along that he was going to help his brother win Florida? I don't know but sounds shady to me.
2007-07-15 19:37:01 · answer #8 · answered by Skinny 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Shouldn't we all be aiming at an electoral system that we all know is above reproach rather than making partisan cheap shot points?
2007-07-15 20:06:44 · answer #9 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everyone got something they wine about. Like GOP with their Clinton complains.
2007-07-15 19:38:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think we should abandon all voting machines and just go back to yea or nay's. or thumbs up or thumbs down. we could send them in by webcam or something.
2007-07-15 19:33:07 · answer #11 · answered by ?! 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋