Yes
2007-07-15 18:39:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by sharpie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary R. Clinton is actually a beautiful lady and has many good qualities... but has done some really shady ugly things as well in the past. I wouldn't vote for her, but as someone said already,.... if she gets elected, "O Canada" will have some new immigrants! I know that beauty is supposed to be more than just skin deep... and maybe she is a beautiful person to some people, but who knows huh! Besides, this isn't really a beauty contest... it's a serious presidential election! Good luck on checking out the real issues! Vote for the person who will be the best possible leader of our country! This could be our first black president or first woman president, or maybe even our first Mormon President! WOW!
2007-07-16 01:40:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by MaggieO 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Crap, all this time I was under the impression we were having a Presidential campaign. I didn't know it was a beauty contest. Maybe you should send Hillary a picture of you. She might think you are ugly.
2007-07-16 01:13:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by truth seeker 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Not sure how this fits into politics, but no I don't think she's ugly. She's very attractive for being 59 years old, and it seems as though she takes good care of herself.
2007-07-16 03:05:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, she is would not be considered ''beautiful'' by the young voters. So, to make it a fair election, she should go against Condi, but that's just an idea.
2007-07-16 01:16:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Auzel 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
To the core... the soul... the linings of her gums... Today on the news she looked like roseolla struck her cheeks, and that voice... OMG... Must be a hot flash for the presidency.
2007-07-16 01:45:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by polity 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
She's looked a lot prettier in the last debate. Good make up or a little nip and tuck? What am I doing????!!!
2007-07-16 01:17:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You know, I was going to vote for her, but now you've made such a convincing case against her, I think I'll write in Pamela Anderson instead.
Troll.
2007-07-16 01:10:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yea she's ugly, but she's also a nasty person. None of the girls her husband cheated on her with were prretty either, but they probably didn't nag him all the time.
2007-07-16 01:40:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anarcho Capitalist 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'm not sure, I can't bring myself to judge her since she's the one that wears the pants in her marriage.
2007-07-16 01:44:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋