English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Wouldn't that solve two problems at once since he doesn't have much use for the document?

2007-07-15 17:52:15 · 17 answers · asked by Remember the GOP? 2 in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

Shhhh... Please don't give him any ideas!! I'm just glad it's guarded and stored under glass in the rotunda of the National Archives building. Dick Cheney won't go near there, but I can picture Bush sneaking in after hours with a grease pencil to add/delete his desired changes.

2007-07-15 19:23:17 · answer #1 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 1 2

It's interesting how Bush-haters so readily forget that in most other countries, especially as little as a hundred years ago, the words they speak would be considered treason, and they would quote possibly be killed without a fair trial. Whether you like him or not, nobody can deny that he does not restrict basic freedoms of citizens, for whom the Constitution was intended to protect.

Considering the deficit, I would rather have that than a surplus. Ever since Virginia started electing Democrat governors, we've had a gigantic surplus because of all the new taxes. That alone would be fine, except that we continue to recieve new taxes and the money isn't getting spent. You guys may not mind paying a couple thousand dollars for a speeding ticket, but I sure do.

Incidentally, nobody would pay very much for the Constitution, seeing as how we've been giving it away free of charge for the last two hundred years.

2007-07-15 18:05:45 · answer #2 · answered by Terras 5 · 2 2

a super sort of solutions mistake funds deficit with the financial gadget. Bush inherited a funds the place government sales exceeded debt funds. on the time, a recession grew to become into drawing near and so Bush, cavalierly postponed it via offering tax cuts and rebates to the conventional public, besides the certainty that often to the top tax brackets. i grew to become right into a extreme college senior then. Me and my acquaintances used to chuckle lots as quickly as we talked approximately Bush's tax decrease. We, higschool youngsters, knew then that basically an exceedingly ignorant person could ever believe that a recession must be ameliorated by way of tax rebates. We envisioned inflation could follow. fortunate for Bush, 9/eleven happened and each and all the foreseeable financial issues of the recession compounded with the reaction to the assault, subsequently overlaying Bush's irresponcible coverage. Bush persisted deficit spending interior the Keynsian custom, yet he did so whilst slicing social spending, thereby starting to be debt without making an investment in a extra efficient extra equitable society for the destiny. whilst super protection spending has some means to assist the financial gadget without producing lots inflation, it additionally has a tendency to empty the financial gadget after some years. Given the irresponsible habit of the U. S. interior the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions, international investors have started to lose faith interior the soundness human beings coverage. Irresponsible protection spending and tax cuts are what returned the U. S. gov. into deficit spending. i'm no longer an enemy of deficit spending. i think of it is a efficient physique of suggestions although if it is used sparingly. I additionally think of deficit spending with a view to maintain super protection budgets is unquestionably one of those wealth redistribution of the worst sort: scouse borrow from the poor to furnish to the wealthy. there is not any reason for the U. S. to act as belligerently because it does, basically the very wealthy interior the U. S. earnings from protection spending. The poor? who do you may desire to defend your sleves from yet your guy or woman oppressive government?

2016-11-09 10:34:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Interestingly, people who say that questions like this would get you charges of treason... what do you think happens when this is said? "Bush on the Constitution: 'Just a goddamned piece of paper". Wouldn't the same charge apply? I think it's been devalued, and we are raffling off chunks of US property and prosperity to pay for those debts.

2007-07-15 18:15:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

A growing economy, and growing tax revenues, makes deficits less important.

Did you know that in 1996, America paid about 14% of our tax revenues servicing the debt. In 2006, it was only 10%.

A growing economy has swelled tax revenues so much that it is easier and easier to service the debt.

Funny thing, when politicians discuss how to stop deficits, they always say we have to raise taxes or cut spending. They completely forget about the third option, grow the economy and tax revenues.

2007-07-15 18:17:56 · answer #5 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 1 2

Not possible, Bill Clinton sold me the Constitution along with the furniture from the Lincoln bedroom for a substantial "contribution" back in 2003. I got it hanging on my wall over Abe's bunkbed.

2007-07-15 18:02:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

It wasn't President Bush who sold out on Roe v Wade. Now that is an unconstitutional piece of legislation.

2007-07-15 18:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Bush can sell the U.S. Constitution to Iraq and let them use it. Why not? Bush isn't abiding by it anymore? Seems him and Cheney are trying to shred the Bill of Rights as fast as they possibly can. Both of these "low lives" need to be thrown out into the street where they belong.

2007-07-15 18:05:56 · answer #8 · answered by Honey Girl 3 · 6 3

Yeah I agree with you ..But i don't know who would want to buy it because going by the American example it does'nt really do much

2007-07-16 12:57:30 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

only on ebay
no but it is not gust Bush it is all the ppl in office that have no use for it

2007-07-15 18:05:03 · answer #10 · answered by inkp2p 2 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers