English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should every dead Soldier's death be resting on these two negligent Piece's of sh*t that we have in office???

2007-07-15 16:51:36 · 18 answers · asked by Honey Girl 3 in Politics & Government Politics

18 answers

They are the most corrupt pair that has ever held high office in this country. They should go to jail for many years.

2007-07-15 16:55:04 · answer #1 · answered by notyou311 7 · 5 6

Hey Able Rabbit !! Help Me with This.. Let Me see if I have got this Clear. O.K .. So If Everybody's Got An Opinion, and Everbody Has an asssHole, And You Obviously dont Have an Opinion for this Question... Does That Mean that You Have TWO AzzzHoles ??

2007-07-16 00:14:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Sure, as long as you and your liberal party let the death of more than 50 million aborted babies rest with the pieces of sh*t that support Abortion.

There are more babies killed by abortion each DAY in the United States than there are US troops killed since the Iraq invasion, more dead babies daily than all of the civilians, troops and terrorists killed each day in Iraq

This BLOOD is on YOUR hands and the rest of the LIBERALS.

2007-07-16 00:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 1 3

then why not just plug all the deaths of world war II onto FDR, or all the deaths of the civil war on lincoln, i suppose youll blame the deaths of 9-11 on them too? when they are fighting to preserve our freedom, and keep the terrorists out of Iraq, and get them out of the middle east, letting iraq fall will defeat the purpose of going there to begin with, if you cant ride it out now what are u gonna do when we face the consequences later, say the new leaders should have done something?

2007-07-16 00:07:15 · answer #4 · answered by JJ 5 · 2 3

I guess you guys are all right. I mean, no Iraqi civilians ever died when Saddam was in power. And there's no way that the terrorists could have possibly killed any civilians.

In order to have more murder, you first have to have murder. It might be semantics, but it's really simple logic.

2007-07-15 23:56:44 · answer #5 · answered by DOOM 7 · 5 2

Be sure to lock your door before you retire this evening - and check the room for bugs. Have your vehicle checked for any tracking devises tomorrow and try and get some medication for your delusions concerning hidden agendas.

2007-07-15 23:59:42 · answer #6 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 3 3

EVERYONE, be careful how you respond. They might be on yahoo answers right now. After all, we know they're not busy doing anything important to help the world. This whole question could be a trap. They are undoubtedly waiting for their next victims

2007-07-15 23:56:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

Yes

2007-07-15 23:55:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Bush snickers too much. I don't think that the soldiers dying really effects him all that much.

If they did, he would have sent them to battle with a DEFSEC worth his mettle, and a plan for success. Not a bunch of fricking slogans.

2007-07-15 23:56:19 · answer #9 · answered by powhound 7 · 4 4

You are so misinformed that your question isn't even worth answering. It is because of people like you that the United States will eventually go down the drain, and it isn't far off...

2007-07-15 23:57:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 4

fedest.com, questions and answers