English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please help with an ongoing argument between my husband and me.... We are both blondes with blue eyes (mine dark, his very light, even blonde eyelashes). My father has red hair and blue eyes, and my mother is a brunette with brown eyes. His father has light brown hair, and his mother is blonde with blue eyes. I think the chance is there for a redheaded child, (because of my dad and also several family members on my paternal side) however hubby insists that he also has to have a history of red hair in his family for it to happen (which there is none). For the first year of my life I was strawberry blonde (heavy on the strawberry), then it turned the color I have now. Is it possible to have a redhead or do I have to eat crow and tell him he's right - the only possibility for our child is blonde hair and blue eyes?

2007-07-15 16:20:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Biology

12 answers

Red hair can be either autosomal recessive, which means that both parents have to carry the trait or it can be incomplete dominant, which means that it can blend with another color.

Since your father has red hair, you got passed to you the trait for red hair. It is just masked by another dominant gene or allele. You husband more than likely doesn't have the trait at all since no one in his family has had red hair. There is a fifty percent chance that each child you have will carry the red hair trait, but since it's recessive none will be red heads. If they do receive the red hair trait from you, then they could be strawberry blond.

I think they are still unlocking the genetic causes of the incomplete dominance, so it would be tough to predict.

More than likely your child will have blond hair, with a small chance of strawberry blond.

2007-07-15 16:41:27 · answer #1 · answered by Trevin M 2 · 0 1

You have 2 X genes and your companion had an X and a Y gene. The X gene you donated for your daughter used to be the purple haired gene, and the X gene your companion donated used to be the purple haired gene. You would certainly have brown hair and brown eyes, nonetheless the paternal sperm donor father might by and large no less than exhibit a few signs of being "a ginger". It is your loved ones in which you get your X gene from. Either your father, or your mom gave you it. As your father didn't have the indications, it have to were your mom. Therefore, your mom could have been a provider who acquired the gene both from her father or from her mom. (This can cross on a couple of generations till you uncover the ginger) It is more often than not viewed that the Y gene in a male is regressive for hair color, and so it's not crucial for a feminine daughter. This is simply my interpretation, extra distinct evaluation is to be had within the following hyperlink. I could also be fallacious approximately the paternal father of a purple haired woman, however the possibilities of her father being now not ginger in anyway are narrow. It turns out that the inheritance of purple hair isn't but scientifically identified absolutely but. I suspect there's no corporation end in this one in the interim....

2016-09-05 12:00:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The gene for red hair is recessive. That means that both parents must carry at least one copy for the child to get two copies for the trait to be visible (have red hair).
I worked out a Punneett Square (2 actually) and here are some relevant results.
If in fact your husband does carry a copy, you would have a chance of having a red headed child.
The chances would in fact be 50%, I am basing this on the idea that you are a red head. If you are in fact a blond with one copy of the red head gene, and your husband carries a copy, your chances are 25%. If your husband does not carry a copy, (as it sound like that is the case) your chances would then be 0%. With each child, these chances do not change.

2007-07-15 16:40:17 · answer #3 · answered by K B 2 · 1 2

It's unlikely you will have any child that isn't blonde haired and blue eyed.

The gene for red hair is a mutated version of a light brown hair gene. Since it would have to come from you and the red hair gene is dominant over blonde and you happen to be blonde, you don't have the red hair gene for your child to get it.

Dominance of genes for hair color is dark to light.
Black>Dk.Brown>Lt.Brown or Red>Blonde

Some mosaicism occurs of course.

2007-07-15 16:26:13 · answer #4 · answered by special-chemical-x 6 · 1 1

You have a great chance at having a redheaded child. If your dad has red hair, there's a great chance. My bro-in-law has red hair. He has 2 uncles on his mom's side that have red hair.

But, only nature will decide what your children will look like.

2007-07-15 16:32:18 · answer #5 · answered by snakekeeper27 4 · 0 1

Red hair genes are recessive ones, so you may have 1/16 chances of having a red hair baby, regardless of the sex that transmit the gene.

2007-07-15 16:58:55 · answer #6 · answered by Jedi squirrels 5 · 0 1

My children are both red headed. I am, my parents and two brothers were not but one grandparents was.

My kid's mother is redheaded. Neither her parents nor anyone in her family were that she knew about. Both of her brothers were also redheaded.

If there is a formula, I haven't heard about it yet. I wish you every happiness.

2007-07-15 16:29:38 · answer #7 · answered by Texas Cowboy 7 · 0 0

actually it is likely you could have a red-headed kid. Someone i know is red-headed and neither of their parents are but their great great great grandma had red hair, so it is possible.

2007-07-15 16:29:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Does the milkman have red hair?

2007-07-15 16:30:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

sometimes it skips a generation

its just the luck of the draw actually

red headed kids are SO HOT though...so you shouldnt worry

2007-07-15 18:18:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers